Simplified methods to estimate mean hazard due to updated ground motion model: Application to nuclear power plants in CEUS

被引:1
作者
Talaat, Mohamed M. [1 ,2 ]
Seifried, Andrew [3 ]
Anup, Abhinav [1 ]
Hardy, Gregory S. [1 ]
Richards, John M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, 4695 MacArthur Court,Suite 500, Newport Beach, CA 92660 USA
[2] Cairo Univ, Dept Struct Engn, Giza, Egypt
[3] Lettis Consultants Int Inc, Concord, CA USA
[4] Elect Power Res Inst, Charlotte, NC USA
关键词
CEUS seismicity; NGA-East; nuclear power plants; NTTF; 2; 1; PSHA; SiHaz; seismic hazard; seismic hazard scaling; simplified hazard; site amplification;
D O I
10.1177/87552930211007499
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Two methods were developed to estimate updated mean seismic hazard for existing probabilistic seismic hazard analyses (PSHAs) due to a change in the ground motion model (GMM). Both methods were used to estimate updated hazard at nuclear power plant (NPP) sites in the Central and Eastern United States (CEUS) for a change from the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) 2013 GMM to the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA)-East GMM. These methods present efficient tools to inform decisions on whether to perform a full PSHA revision or other detailed evaluations, especially when a large number of sites must be analyzed. A Simplified Hazard (SiHaz) method was developed to estimate mean hazard explicitly using a reduced PSHA logic tree that incorporates the updated GMM and potential changes in the site response model. An alternative scaling method was independently developed to be applied directly to current CEUS NPP hazard. Both methods were validated using updated PSHA results at several sites. Estimates at 46 NPP sites using both methods showed good agreement for mean annual frequencies of exceedance between 1E-4 and 1E-5/yr.
引用
收藏
页码:1550 / 1578
页数:29
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 2004, 1009684 EPRI
[2]  
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 2020, 3002018216 EPRI 3002018216 EPRI
[3]  
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) EPRI, 2013, EPRI 3002000717
[4]  
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC), 2012, 1021097 EPRI 1021097 EPRI
[5]  
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute), 2013, Rep. No. 1025287
[6]  
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), 2018, PROBABILISTIC SEISMI
[7]  
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), 2018, 201808 PEER 201808 PEER
[8]  
Talaat MM, EARTHQ SPECTRA
[9]  
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2019, UN HAZ TOOL UN HAZ TOOL
[10]  
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC), 1997, NUREGCR6372 USNRC NUREGCR6372 USNRC