Low target-INR anticoagulation is safe in selected aortic valve patients with the Medtronic Open Pivot mechanical prosthesis: long-term results of a propensity-matched comparison with standard anticoagulation

被引:12
作者
Bove, Thierry [1 ]
Van Belleghem, Yves [1 ]
Francois, Katrien [1 ]
Caes, Frank [1 ]
De Pauw, Michel [1 ]
Taeymans, Yves [1 ]
Van Nooten, Guido J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ghent, Heart Ctr, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Mechanical aortic valve prosthesis; Outcome analysis; Anticoagulation; HEART-VALVE; ORAL ANTICOAGULATION; SELF-MANAGEMENT; INTENSITY ANTICOAGULATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; FINAL REPORT; FOLLOW-UP; REPLACEMENT; EXPERIENCE; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivx028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term results of a low international normalized ratio ( INR)-anticoagulation program in selected patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the Medtronic Open Pivot mechanical heart valve (OPMHV). METHODS: From January 1993 to December 2012, 909 OPMHV valves were used for single AVR. Patients with preserved sinus rhythm and left ventricular function (Low-INR, n = 552), were managed to an INR of 1.5-2.5 and compared to patients (Standard-INR, n = 357) treated with standard anticoagulation (INR 2.5-3.5). Long-term outcome was analysed for survival and valve-related events, on propensity score matched pairs of 169 patients/group. RESULTS: Within a follow-up cumulating 3096 patient-years, 10- and 15-year survival was significantly better for Low-INR patients: 79% and 63% vs 63% and 34% (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of late mortality identified older age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.05], chronic pulmonary disease (OR = 1.90) and coronary artery disease (OR = 1.57) as patient-related risk factors, and erratic INR (OR= 2.57) as anticoagulation-related factor. The linearized thromboembolic rate was 0.72%/patient-year in Low-INR patients, vs 0.87%/patient-year in Standard-INR patients (P = 0.59), revealing INR variability as sole predictor (OR 3.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-10.51, P = 0.022). The linearized bleeding incidence was respectively 0.61%/patient-year and 1.21%/patient-year for Low-INR and Standard-INR patients (P = 0.04), retaining older age (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.12, P = 0.009), hypertension (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.00-4.25, P = 0.05) and erratic INR (OR 9.83, 95% CI 5.21-18.56, P < 0.001) as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that application of an anticoagulation regimen, aiming a low INR, individualized to selected aortic OPMHV patients, is safe and effective over more than 20 years, without increasing the thromboembolic complication rate while lowering the haemorrhagic events. However, INR variability remains worrisome because of its deleterious effect on outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 868
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   AREVA: Multicenter randomized comparison of low-dose versus standard-dose anticoagulation in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves [J].
Acar, J ;
Iung, B ;
Boissel, JP ;
Samama, MM ;
Michel, PL ;
Teppe, JP ;
Pony, JC ;
LeBreton, H ;
Thomas, D ;
Isnard, R ;
deGevigney, G ;
Viguier, E ;
Sfihi, A ;
Hanania, G ;
Ghannem, M ;
Mirode, A ;
Nemoz, C ;
Bossard, N ;
Rolland, C ;
Lion, L ;
Marsault, C ;
Ferroir, JP ;
Conard, J ;
Laborde, JP ;
Logeais, Y ;
Delahaye, JP ;
Guerin, F ;
Lainee, R ;
Lesbre, JP .
CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (09) :2107-2112
[2]   Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions [J].
Akins, Cary W. ;
Miller, D. Craig ;
Turina, Marko I. ;
Kouchoukos, Nicholas T. ;
Blackstone, Eugene H. ;
Grunkemeier, Gary L. ;
Takkenberg, Johanna J. M. ;
David, Tirone E. ;
Butchart, Eric G. ;
Adams, David H. ;
Shahian, David M. ;
Hagl, Siegfried ;
Mayer, John E. ;
Lytle, Bruce W. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 135 (04) :732-738
[3]  
[Anonymous], J THORAC CARDIOVASC
[4]  
Arom KV, 1996, J HEART VALVE DIS, V5, P505
[5]   Vortex shedding as a mechanism for free emboli formation in mechanical heart valves [J].
Bluestein, D ;
Rambod, E ;
Gharib, M .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (02) :125-134
[6]   Better anticoagulation control improves survival after valve replacement [J].
Butchart, EG ;
Payne, N ;
Li, HH ;
Buchan, K ;
Mandana, K ;
Grunkemeier, GL .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 123 (04) :715-723
[7]   EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF COMBINED ANTICOAGULANT AND ANTIPLATELET THERAPY VERSUS ANTICOAGULANT MONOTHERAPY AFTER MECHANICAL HEART-VALVE REPLACEMENT - A METAANALYSIS [J].
CAPPELLERI, JC ;
FIORE, LD ;
BROPHY, MT ;
DEYKIN, D ;
LAU, J .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 130 (03) :547-552
[8]   Clinical event rates with the On-X bileaflet mechanical heart valve: A multicenter experience with follow-up to 12 years [J].
Chambers, John B. ;
Pomar, Jose L. ;
Mestres, Carlos A. ;
Palatianos, George M. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 145 (02) :420-424
[9]   The St. jude medical cardiac valve prosthesis: A 25-year experience with single valve replacement [J].
Emery, RW ;
Krogh, CC ;
Arom, KV ;
Emery, AM ;
Benyo-Albrecht, K ;
Joyce, LD ;
Nicoloff, DM .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 79 (03) :776-783
[10]   Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: Final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial [J].
Hammermeister, K ;
Sethi, GK ;
Henderson, WG ;
Grover, FL ;
Oprian, C ;
Rahimtoola, SH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (04) :1152-1158