Theory and observations of upward field-aligned currents at the magnetopause boundary layer

被引:18
作者
Wing, Simon [1 ]
Johnson, Jay R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Appl Phys Lab, Laurel, MD 20723 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Plasma Phys Lab, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SOLAR-WIND; MAGNETIC-FIELD; LOW-ALTITUDE; LATITUDE; PRECIPITATION; IDENTIFICATION; MAGNETOSHEATH; CONDUCTANCES; IONIZATION; REGIONS;
D O I
10.1002/2015GL065464
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The dependence of the upward field-aligned current density (J(vertical bar vertical bar)) at the dayside magnetopause boundary layer is well described by a simple analytic model based on a velocity shear generator. A previous observational survey confirmed that the scaling properties predicted by the analytical model are applicable between 11 and 17 MLT. We utilize the analytic model to predict field-aligned currents using solar wind and ionospheric parameters and compare with direct observations. The calculated and observed parallel currents are in excellent agreement, suggesting that the model may be useful to infer boundary layer structures. However, near noon, where velocity shear is small, the kinetic pressure gradients and thermal currents, which are not included in the model, could make a small but significant contribution to J(vertical bar vertical bar). Excluding data from noon, our least squares fit returns log(J(vertical bar vertical bar),(max_cal)) = (0.96 +/- 0.04) log(J(vertical bar vertical bar_obs)) + (0.03 +/- 0.01) where J(vertical bar vertical bar,max_cal) = calculated J(vertical bar vertical bar,max) and J(vertical bar vertical bar_obs) = observed J(vertical bar vertical bar).
引用
收藏
页码:9149 / 9155
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Electric potential differences across auroral generator interfaces [J].
De Keyser, J. ;
Echim, M. .
ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2013, 31 (02) :251-261
[2]   The statistical mapping of magnetosheath plasma properties based on THEMIS measurements in the magnetosheath interplanetary medium reference frame [J].
Dimmock, A. P. ;
Nykyri, K. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2013, 118 (08) :4963-4976
[3]   Ionospheric feedback effects on the quasi-stationary coupling between LLBL and postnoon/evening discrete auroral arcs [J].
Echim, M. M. ;
Roth, M. ;
De Keyser, J. .
ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2008, 26 (04) :913-928
[4]   Sheared magnetospheric plasma flows and discrete auroral arcs: a quasi-static coupling model [J].
Echim, M. M. ;
Roth, M. ;
De Keyser, J. .
ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2007, 25 (01) :317-330
[5]   Two-dimensional Vlasov solution for a collisionless plasma jet across transverse magnetic field lines with a sheared bulk velocity [J].
Echim, MM ;
Lemaire, JF .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2005, 72 (03)
[6]   Structure of the low-latitude boundary layer: A case study with Geotail data [J].
Fujimoto, M ;
Mukai, T ;
Kawano, H ;
Nakamura, M ;
Nishida, A ;
Saito, Y ;
Yamamoto, T ;
Kokubun, S .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1998, 103 (A2) :2297-2308
[7]   Ionospheric electrical conductances produced by auroral proton precipitation [J].
Galand, M ;
Richmond, AD .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2001, 106 (A1) :117-125
[8]  
HARDY DA, 1984, AFGLTR840317 HANSC A
[9]   Automatic identification of large-scale field-aligned current structures [J].
Higuchi, T ;
Ohtani, S .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2000, 105 (A11) :25305-25315
[10]   The dependence of the strength and thickness of field-aligned currents on solar wind and ionospheric parameters [J].
Johnson, Jay R. ;
Wing, Simon .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2015, 120 (05) :3987-4008