Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response

被引:78
作者
Ohlenforst, Barbara [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Wendt, Dorothea [6 ,7 ]
Kramer, Sophia E. [1 ,2 ]
Naylor, Graham [8 ,9 ]
Zekveld, Adriana A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lunner, Thomas [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Sect Ear & Hearing, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Med Ctr, POB 7057, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, POB 7057, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Linkoping Univ, Dept Behav Sci & Learning, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Linnaeus Ctr HEAD, Swedish Inst Disabil Res, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Orebro Univ, Linnaeus Ctr HEAD, Swedish Inst Disabil Res, Orebro, Sweden
[6] Oticon AS, Eriksholm Res Ctr, Smorum, Denmark
[7] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Elect Engn, Lyngby, Denmark
[8] MRC CSO Inst Hearing Res, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[9] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, England
关键词
Hearing impairment; Speech recognition; Noise reduction scheme; Hearing aids; Pupil dilation; Listening effort; Signal-to-noise ratio; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY; OLDER-ADULTS; VISUAL CUES; LOAD; MEMORY; ENHANCEMENT; COMPRESSION; INSIGHTS; RECALL;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.003
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Recent studies have shown that activating the noise reduction scheme in hearing aids results in a smaller peak pupil dilation (PPD), indicating reduced listening effort, at 50% and 95% correct sentence recognition with a 4-talker masker. The objective of this study was to measure the effect of the noise reduction scheme (on or off) on PPD and sentence recognition across a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) from +16 dB to -12 dB and two masker types (4-talker and stationary noise). Relatively low PPDs were observed at very low (-12 dB) and very high (+16 dB to +8 dB) SNRs presumably due to 'giving up' and 'easy listening', respectively. The maximum PPD was observed with SNRs at approximately 50% correct sentence recognition. Sentence recognition with both masker types was significantly improved by the noise reduction scheme, which corresponds to the shift in performance from SNR function at approximately 5 dB toward a lower SNR. This intelligibility effect was accompanied by a corresponding effect on the PPD, shifting the peak by approximately 4 dB toward a lower SNR. In addition, with the 4-talker masker, when the noise reduction scheme was active, the PPD was smaller overall than that when the scheme was inactive. We conclude that with the 4-talker masker, noise reduction scheme processing provides a listening effort benefit in addition to any effect associated with improved intelligibility. Thus, the effect of the noise reduction scheme on listening effort incorporates more than can be explained by intelligibility alone, emphasizing the potential importance of measuring listening effort in addition to traditional speech reception measures. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 99
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, J ACOUST SOC AM, DOI [DOI 10.1121/1.4989330, 10.1121/1.4989330]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, IMERTEST TESTS LINEA
[3]  
BAER T, 1993, J REHABIL RES DEV, V30, P49
[4]  
Bates D., 2014, Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
[5]   TASK-EVOKED PUPILLARY RESPONSES, PROCESSING LOAD, AND THE STRUCTURE OF PROCESSING RESOURCES [J].
BEATTY, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 91 (02) :276-292
[6]   Digital noise reduction: Outcomes from laboratory and field studies [J].
Bentler, Ruth ;
Wu, Yu-Hsiang ;
Kettel, Jerrica ;
Hurtig, Richard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 47 (08) :447-460
[7]  
Brehm J W, 1999, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, V3, P2, DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_1
[8]  
Dillon H, 1993, SINGLE MICROPHONE NO
[9]   Pupillometry reveals processing load during spoken language comprehension [J].
Engelhardt, Paul E. ;
Ferreira, Fernanda ;
Patsenko, Elena G. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (04) :639-645
[10]   EFFECTS OF FLUCTUATING NOISE AND INTERFERING SPEECH ON THE SPEECH-RECEPTION THRESHOLD FOR IMPAIRED AND NORMAL HEARING [J].
FESTEN, JM ;
PLOMP, R .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1990, 88 (04) :1725-1736