Is China's carbon trading market efficient? Evidence from emissions trading scheme pilots

被引:73
作者
Wang, Xiao-Qing [1 ]
Su, Chi-Wei [1 ]
Lobont, Oana-Ramona [2 ]
Li, Hao [3 ]
Nicoleta-Claudia, Moldovan [2 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Sch Econ, 308 Ningxa Rd, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] West Univ Timisoara, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Finance Dept, Timisoara, Romania
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon trading; Efficient market hypothesis; Sequential panel selection method; Panel KSS unit Root test; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; STRUCTURAL BREAKS; PANEL-DATA; EU; PRICE; VOLATILITY; LIQUIDITY; EVOLUTION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2022.123240
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Y This paper examines whether the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) holds in the Chinese carbon trading pilots by employing the Sequential Panel Selection Method (SPSM) which is combined with the Panel KSS unit root tests with Fourier function. This approach serves as a highly valid tool in controlling for cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity as well as structural shifts and nonlinearities. In virtue of the SPSM, the paper could divide the whole panel into two groups and clearly identify which and how many series belong to stationary or non-stationary group. The results show that carbon prices follow mean reversion process, indicating that the EMH does not hold in the Chinese emissions trading scheme (ETS), with the exception of Shanghai. The inefficiency of ETS pilots can be explained by irrational behaviors, poor information transparency, imperfect market mechanism and transaction costs. Accordingly, the failure of EMH implies the existence of profitable arbitrage opportunities for market participants. To establish the nationwide ETS market, policy lessons should be learned from Shanghai as this pilot is demonstrated to be an efficient market. Additionally, policymakers should improve the trading information disclosure system and formulate uniform guidelines, which is propitious to enhance market efficiency of the Chinese ETS. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005-2007 [J].
Alberola, Emilie ;
Chevallier, Julien ;
Cheze, Benoit .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (02) :787-797
[2]   Coal phase-outs and carbon prices: Interactions between EU emission trading and national carbon mitigation policies [J].
Anke, Carl-Philipp ;
Hobbie, Hannes ;
Schreiber, Steffi ;
Moest, Dominik .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 144
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V145
[4]   Market efficiency assessment under dual pricing rule for the Turkish wholesale electricity market [J].
Asan, Goksel ;
Tasaltin, Kamil .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 107 :109-118
[5]   Trader types and volatility of emission allowance prices. Evidence from EU ETS Phase I [J].
Balietti, Anca Claudia .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 98 :607-620
[6]   Efficient market hypothesis in European stock markets [J].
Borges, Maria Rosa .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 16 (07) :711-726
[7]  
Breuer J.B., 2001, REV INT ECON, V9, P482, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1467-9396.00294, 10.1111/1467-9396.00294]
[8]   The impacts of liquidity dynamics on emissions allowances price: Different evidence from China's emissions trading pilots [J].
Chang, Kai ;
Lu, Shibao ;
Song, Xiayun .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 183 :786-796
[9]   Market efficiency in the European carbon markets [J].
Charles, Amelie ;
Darne, Olivier ;
Fouilloux, Jessica .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 60 :785-792
[10]   Unit root tests for panel data [J].
Choi, I .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2001, 20 (02) :249-272