Breast magnetic resonance imaging: are those who need it getting it?

被引:2
作者
Tan, S. [1 ]
David, J. [1 ]
Lalonde, L. [1 ]
El Khoury, M. [1 ]
Labelle, M. [1 ]
Younan, R. [2 ]
Patocskai, E. [2 ]
Richard, J. [3 ]
Trop, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Radiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Dept Gen Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Breast cancer; imaging; MRI; HIGH FAMILIAL RISK; LOBULAR CARCINOMA; CONTRALATERAL BREAST; PERSONAL HISTORY; CANCER YIELD; WOMEN; MRI; MAMMOGRAPHY; SURVEILLANCE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.3747/co.24.3441
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a very sensitive but less-specific tool for breast investigation, remain controversial, and accessibility is limited. The purposes of our study were to determine the proportion of breast MRI exams performed for various clinical indications, to assess the wait times for breast MRI, and to create a list of evidence-based indications for breast MRI. Methods The indications for breast MRI exams performed in September 2013 at our academic centre were audited. A multidisciplinary meeting held in May 2014 established a list of evidence-based indications for breast MRI, after which, in September 2014 and 2015, breast MRI exams were re-audited for clinical indications, and pending requests were calculated. Results In September 2013, surveillance of women with a prior diagnosis of breast cancer represented 21% of breast MRI exams (24 of 113), with preoperative staging representing 18% of exams (20 of 113) and high-risk screening representing 12% (13 of 113). Of pending MRI requests, 230 were within the recommended delay period, and 457 exceeded the recommended delay. After elaboration of evidence-based guidelines, repeat audits in September 2014 and September 2015 showed that MRI performed for women with a prior breast cancer diagnosis represented 23% (33 of 141) and 7% (10 of 143) of exams respectively, with preoperative staging having declined to 9% (13 of 141) and 11% (16 of 143) of exams, and high-risk screening having increased to 36% (51 of 141) and 46% (66 of 143) of exams. Overall, wait times were improved for all breast MRI indications. Conclusions Through multidisciplinary discussion, we actualized a list of breast MRI indications, prioritized requests more adequately, and improved wait times.
引用
收藏
页码:E205 / E213
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[11]   Outcomes of Multimodality Breast Screening for Women at Increased Risk of Familial Breast Cancer [J].
Bennett, Ian C. ;
Muller, Jennifer ;
Cockburn, Linda ;
Joshua, Helen ;
Thorley, Gillian ;
Baker, Christine ;
Wood, Nili ;
Brazier, Jane ;
Jones, Mark ;
Dunn, Nathan ;
Gattas, Michael .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 34 (05) :979-986
[12]   Tailored Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer: What Now and What Next? [J].
Berg, Wendie A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (02) :390-399
[13]   Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging As It Is, in Contrast to How We Wish It to Be [J].
Bleicher, Richard J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (05) :370-372
[14]   Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy [J].
Bluemke, DA ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Chen, MH ;
DeAngelis, GA ;
DeBruhl, N ;
Harms, S ;
Heywang-Köbrunner, SH ;
Hylton, N ;
Kuhl, CK ;
Lehman, C ;
Pisano, ED ;
Causer, P ;
Schnitt, SJ ;
Smazal, SF ;
Stelling, CB ;
Weatherall, PT ;
Schnall, MD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (22) :2735-2742
[15]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of the Contralateral Breast in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incremental Cancer Detection and Impact on Surgical Management [J].
Brennan, Meagan Elizabeth ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Lord, Sarah ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Irwig, Les ;
Dixon, J. Michael ;
Warren, Ruth M. L. ;
Ciatto, Stefano .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (33) :5640-5649
[16]   Breast MRI Screening of Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer [J].
Brennan, Sandra ;
Liberman, Laura ;
Dershaw, D. David ;
Morris, Elizabeth .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) :510-516
[17]  
Canadian Association of Radiologists (car), 2012, CAR PRACT GUID TECHN
[18]  
Canadian Association of Radiologists (car), 2013, NAT MAX WAIT TIM ACC, P3
[19]  
Canadian Medical Association (cma), 2016, CHOOS WIS CAN
[20]  
Cancer Care Ontario (cco), 2013, BREAST CANC SCREEN