Pedicle screw augmentation from a biomechanical perspective

被引:35
作者
Bullmann, V. [1 ]
Liljenqvist, U. R. [2 ]
Roedl, R. [1 ]
Schulte, T. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Munster, Klin & Poliklin Allgemeine Orthopadie & Tumororth, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] St Franziskus Hosp Munster, Orthopad Klin Wirbelsaulenchirurg 2, Munster, Germany
来源
ORTHOPADE | 2010年 / 39卷 / 07期
关键词
Pedicle screw; Osteoporosis; Bone cement; Augmentation; Biomechanics; PULLOUT STRENGTH; FIXATION; HOLE;
D O I
10.1007/s00132-010-1602-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Severe osteoporosis is a serious problem in the instrumentation during spine surgery. Besides kyphosis, adjacent vertebral fractures and of course pedicle screw loosening and implant pullout are frequent challenges in instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine. In addition to screw diameter and length, bone mineral density has the most important impact on the stability of a pedicle screw. In cases of severe osteoporosis cement augmentation increases the stability of a pedicle screw. Pullout force can be increased with augmentation by 96-278%. Nowadays, there are two different procedures for augmentation: cement augmentation of the vertebra before inserting the screw into the soft, fresh cement or augmentation via a perforated screw that has already been inserted. The main problem in augmentation techniques are cement leakages. In both techniques leakages may occur. The problem of leakages seems to be less severe in the augmentation technique via the perforated screw, because cement application can be stopped immediately if the onset of leakage is noticed. Even surgical revision of cement augmented screws is not a major clinical problem based on recent biomechanical studies. The revision screw can be chosen 1 mm thicker and can be cement augmented again without technical problems.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 678
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Revision characteristics of cement-augmented, cannulated-fenestrated pedicle screws in the osteoporotic vertebral body: a biomechanical in vitro investigation Technical note [J].
Blattert, Thomas R. ;
Glasmacher, Stefan ;
Riesner, Hans-Joachim ;
Josten, Christoph .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2009, 11 (01) :23-27
[2]  
BULLMANN V, 2010, SPINE IN PRESS
[3]   Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae - Biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength [J].
Burval, Daniel J. ;
McLain, Robert F. ;
Milks, Ryan ;
Inceoglu, Serkan .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (10) :1077-1083
[4]   Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screw for osteoporotic spinal surgery [J].
Chang, Ming-Chau ;
Liu, Chien-Lin ;
Chen, Tain-Hsiung .
SPINE, 2008, 33 (10) :E317-E324
[5]   Pullout strength for cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation in severely osteoporotic bone: Influences of radial hole and pilot hole tapping [J].
Chen, Lih-Huei ;
Tai, Ching-Lung ;
Lai, Po-Liang ;
Lee, De-Mei ;
Tsai, Tsung-Tin ;
Fu, Tsai-Sheng ;
Niu, Chi-Chien ;
Chen, Wen-Jer .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2009, 24 (08) :613-618
[6]  
Cook Stephen D, 2004, Spine J, V4, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.11.010
[7]   CORRELATIONS BETWEEN SCREW HOLE PREPARATION, TORQUE OF INSERTION, AND PULLOUT STRENGTH FOR SPINAL SCREWS [J].
DAFTARI, TK ;
HORTON, WC ;
HUTTON, WC .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1994, 7 (02) :139-145
[8]   Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone [J].
Derincek, A ;
Wu, C ;
Mehbod, A ;
Transfeldt, EE .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2006, 19 (04) :286-291
[9]   Segmental polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation in patients with bone softening caused by osteoporosis and metastatic tumor involvement: A clinical evaluation [J].
Frankel, Bruce A. ;
Jones, Tanya ;
Wang, Chiang .
NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 61 (03) :531-537
[10]   A biomechanical cadaveric analysis of polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation [J].
Frankel, Bruce M. ;
D'Agostino, Sabino ;
Wang, Chiang .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 7 (01) :47-53