Effect of ambient pressure on the extinction limit for opposed flame spread over an electrical wire in microgravity ?

被引:11
作者
Nagachi, Masashi [1 ]
Citerne, Jean-Marie [2 ]
Dutilleul, Hugo [2 ]
Guibaud, Augustin [2 ]
Jomaas, Grunde [3 ]
Legros, Guillaume [2 ]
Hashimoto, Nozomu [1 ]
Fujita, Osamu [1 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0668628, Japan
[2] Sorbonne Univ, Inst Jean Rond dAlembert, CNRS, UMR 7190, F-75005 Paris, France
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Engn, Edinburgh EH9 3FG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Ambient pressure; Opposed flame spread; Microgravity; Electrical wire; Fire safety in space; FIRE SAFETY; INSULATION; MECHANISMS; IGNITION; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.proci.2020.05.005
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Parabolic flight experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of ambient pressure on the extinction limit for opposed flame spread over an electric wire insulation in microgravity. Low-density polyethylene insulated Nickel-Chrome wires with inner core diameter of 0.50 mm and insulation thickness of 0.30 mm were examined for ambient pressures ranging from 50 kPa to 140 kPa for an external opposed flow of 10 cm/s. The experiments showed that the limiting volumetric oxygen concentration (LOC) increased as the total ambient pressure decreased. This LOC trend can be explained by radiation loss from wire surface. The radiation loss increased as the ambient pressure decreased - a result that can be explained by the increase in preheat length with decreasing ambient pressure. Moreover, when the data was plotted in a partial pressure vs. total pressure space, it became evident that the limiting oxygen partial pressure (LOPP) decreased with decreasing total ambient pressure. This LOPP trend can be explained by the fact that the flame temperature increased as the ambient pressure decreased under constant oxygen partial pressure. In current fire safety design for spacecraft, tentative oxygen concentration criteria in spacecraft suggested by NASA is assumed as 30% of oxygen concentration, and this value is assumed independent of ambient pressure. However, the present result implies that consideration of the effect of ambient pressure on the flammability limit is necessary, especially with respect to the possibility of an extension of the allowable atmosphere condition for spacecraft cabin in the low pressure region. (c) 2020 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4767 / 4774
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Abercromby A., 2019, INTEGRATED EXTRAVEHI
  • [2] Fire safety in space - Investigating flame spread interaction over wires
    Citerne, Jean-Marie
    Dutilleul, Hugo
    Kizawa, Koki
    Nagachi, Masashi
    Fujita, Osamu
    Kikuchi, Masao
    Jomaas, Grunde
    Rouvreau, Sebastien
    Torero, Jose L.
    Legros, Guillaume
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2016, 126 : 500 - 509
  • [3] Dutilleul H., 2019, FIRE TECHNOL
  • [4] Dripping and Fire Extinction Limits of Thin Wire: Effect of Pressure and Oxygen
    Fang, Jun
    Zhang, Yue
    Huang, Xinyan
    Xue, Yan
    Wang, Jingwu
    Zhao, Siwei
    He, Xuanze
    Zhao, Luyao
    [J]. COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 193 (03) : 437 - 452
  • [5] CONTROLLING MECHANISMS OF FLAME SPREAD
    FERNANDEZPELLO, AC
    HIRANO, T
    [J]. COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1983, 32 (1-4) : 1 - 31
  • [6] NEAR-LIMIT FLAME SPREAD OVER PAPER SAMPLES
    FREY, AE
    TIEN, JS
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1976, 26 (02) : 257 - 267
  • [7] Friedman R., 1996, Fire Mater, V20, P235, DOI DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199609)20:5<235::AID-FAM580>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-Y
  • [9] Effect of low external flow on flame spread over polyethylene-insulated wire in microgravity
    Fujita, O
    Nishizawa, K
    Ito, K
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2002, 29 : 2545 - 2552
  • [10] Effective mechanisms to determine flame spread rate over ethylene-tetrafluoroethylzene wire insulation: Discussion on dilution gas effect based on temperature measurements
    Fujita, O
    Kikuchi, M
    Ito, K
    Nishizawa, K
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2000, 28 (02) : 2905 - 2911