Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions

被引:246
作者
Guimond, S [1 ]
Dambrun, M [1 ]
Michinov, N [1 ]
Duarte, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clermont Ferrand, Lab Psychol Sociale Cognit, UMR 6024 CNRS, F-63000 Clermont Ferrand, France
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Social dominance orientation (SDO) has been proposed as an important variable in the explanation of prejudice. We distinguish between three conceptualizations of SDO: SDO as a personality trait (personality model), SDO as a moderator of the effects of situational variables (Person X Situation model), and SDO as a mediator of the effect of social position on prejudice (group socialization model [GSM]). Four studies (N = 1,657) looking at the relations between social positions, SDO, and prejudice in a natural setting and in a laboratory setting provide strong support for, the GSM. In contrast to previous correlational findings, there is evidence of a cause (dominant social position), an effect (prejudice increases), and a mediator (SDO). These results suggest new perspectives on the integration of individual and contextual determinants of prejudice.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 721
页数:25
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
Adorno T. W., 1950, AUTHORITARIAN PERSON
[2]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[3]   The other "authoritarian personality" [J].
Altemeyer, B .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 :47-92
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, STEREOTYPES DISCRIMI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, INT REV SOC PSYCHOL
[6]  
Bargh J.A., 1990, HDB MOTIVATION COGNI, V2, P93
[7]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[8]  
BEREITER C, 1962, AM COLLEGE, P563
[9]   Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability [J].
Bettencourt, BA ;
Dorr, N ;
Charlton, K ;
Hume, DL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2001, 127 (04) :520-542
[10]  
Billig M., 1976, Social psychology and intergroup relations