Deploying a shipping infrastructure to enable carbon capture and storage from Norwegian industries

被引:12
作者
Bjerketvedt, Vegard Skonseng [1 ]
Tomasgard, Asgeir [1 ]
Roussanaly, Simon [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Ind Econ & Technol Management, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] SINTEF Energy Res, Sem Saelandsvei 11, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Carbon capture and storage; CO; 2; transport; shipping; Norwegian industry; Mixed integer programming; 2-Shipping; CO2 TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES; TECHNOECONOMIC EVALUATION; PIPELINE; COSTS; BENCHMARKING; MODELS; CHAIN; PLANT; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129586
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the deployment over time of a shipping infrastructure to enable carbon capture and storage from Norwegian industries. In particular, optimal transport investments, routing, shipping portfolio, and transport conditions required cost-efficiently connect nine Norwegian and Swedish industrial facilities to the Northern Light Initiative are identified based on a multi-period mixed-integer model. Optimization of the shipping portfolio allows us to analyze the potential benefits of economics of scale and how sailing multi-stop routes can utilize the potential benefits. Analyses show that the transport cost can be reduced by 12% when the optimal shipping portfolio is implemented instead of operating an independent transport chain for each emission source. Shipping at 7-bar is expected to result in lower costs compared 15-bar shipping, but a significant drawback is the technological maturity of the 7-bar transport technology. The model proposes two transport chains run in parallel as cost optimal, the average transport cost of the 15-bar chain is 32.4 euro/ton, and the 7-bar has an average cost of 25.4 euro/ton. A net present value criterion is used to identify the conditions for when retrofitting of the 15-bar transport chain is economically sound. Break-even is achieved when the ship's re-sale price is 60% of the purchase price, and the cost of retrofitting a 15-bar conditioning plant to a 7-bar is 40% of the investment cost. While retrofitting may be an attractive solution, the decisions lead to a less robust shipping portfolio, and the retrofitting of a fully operating carbon capture and storage value chain is regarded as unlikely.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Acorn: Developing full-chain industrial carbon capture and storage in a resource- and infrastructure-rich hydrocarbon province
    Alcalde, Juan
    Heinemann, Niklas
    Mabon, Leslie
    Worden, Richard H.
    de Coninck, Heleen
    Robertson, Hazel
    Maver, Marko
    Ghanbari, Saeed
    Swennenhuis, Floris
    Mann, Indira
    Walker, Tiana
    Gomersal, Sam
    Bond, Clare E.
    Allen, Michael J.
    Haszeldine, R. Stuart
    James, Alan
    Mackay, Eric J.
    Brownsort, Peter A.
    Faulkner, Daniel R.
    Murphy, Steve
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 : 963 - 971
  • [2] Bellona, 2007, O2 CAPT STOR
  • [3] Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry
    Benhelal, Emad
    Zahedi, Gholamreza
    Shamsaei, Ezzatollah
    Bahadori, Alireza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 51 : 142 - 161
  • [4] Optimal design and cost of ship-based CO2 transport under uncertainties and fluctuations
    Bjerketvedt, Vegard Skonseng
    Tomasgard, Asgeir
    Roussanaly, Simon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2020, 103 (103)
  • [5] Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium
    Christiansen, Marielle
    Fagerholt, Kjetil
    Nygreen, Bjorn
    Ronen, David
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 228 (03) : 467 - 483
  • [6] Economic CO2 network optimization model COCATE European Project (2010-2013)
    Coussy, Paula
    Roussanaly, Simon
    Bureau-Cauchois, Gaelle
    Wildenborg, Ton
    [J]. GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 2923 - 2931
  • [7] Optimal design of European supply chains for carbon capture and storage from industrial emission sources including pipe and ship transport
    d'Amore, Federico
    Romano, Matteo Carmelo
    Bezzo, Fabrizio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2021, 109
  • [8] Techno-economic analyses of CO2 liquefaction: Impact of product pressure and impurities
    Deng, Han
    Roussanaly, Simon
    Skaugen, Geir
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRIGERATION-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DU FROID, 2019, 103 : 301 - 315
  • [9] Element Energy Limited, 2018, SHIPP CO2 UK COST ES
  • [10] Fagerholt Kjetil, 1999, INT T OPER RES, P44