Predicted effects of hemoglobin A1c assay precision on a patient population distribution of serial hemoglobin A1c difference values

被引:0
作者
Stickle, Douglas F. [1 ]
Seligman, Mark L.
Landmark, James D.
Quon, Michael J.
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Microbiol, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Stat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] NIH, Natl Ctr Complementary & Alternat Med, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
glycated hemoglobin; hemoglobin A1c; diabetes; precision; point-of-care testing;
D O I
10.1016/j.cca.2006.11.022
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Interpretation of serial measurements of % hemoglobin A1c includes an assessment of differences from preceding values (DHbA1c). We examined predicted effects of different assay precisions on an observed population distribution for DHbA1c. Methods: Primary data were 5260 DHbA1c values from sequential HbA1c measurement pairs obtained within 1 calendar year. Each DHbA1c was replaced by a distribution obtained from sampling each component HbA1c value according to a normal distribution characterized by a fixed coefficient of variation (CV) of either 1%, 3% or 5% (forming data sets A, B and C, respectively). Data sets B and C, with inferior precision, were compared with the reference data set A (highest precision). Results: Using DHbA1c bin widths of 0.5% HbA1c, differences in assay precision caused significant redistribution of numbers within bins. For instance, for CV=5%, there was a 7.2% decrease in the number of results within the DHbA1c bin=(-0.5 to <= 0.0)% compared with the number for CV=1%, and a 6.4% increase in numbers of results for DHbA1c > 0.5. Conclusion: Different HbA1c assay CVs can significantly affect the fraction of patients within different clinical categorizations for DHbA1c and consequently may differently influence patient care recommendations. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 205
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Am Diabetes Assoc, 2006, DIABETES CARE, V29, pS4
[2]  
Fraser C.G, 2001, Biological variation: from principles to practice
[3]  
FRASER CG, 1990, CLIN CHEM, V36, P1625
[4]  
Hawkins R. C., 2003, SMJ Singapore Medical Journal, V44, P008
[5]   Upper reference limit, analytical quality specifications and clinical use of haemoglobin AlC [J].
Jorgensen, LGM ;
Brandslund, I ;
Stahl, M ;
Petersen, PH ;
Iversen, S ;
Klitgaard, N ;
Olivarius, ND .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2002, 62 (08) :609-622
[6]  
Keeling KB, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1513
[7]   A COMPARISON OF ANALYTICAL GOALS FOR HEMOGLOBIN A1C ASSAYS DERIVED USING DIFFERENT STRATEGIES [J].
LARSEN, ML ;
FRASER, CG ;
PETERSEN, PH .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1991, 28 :272-278
[8]  
Little Randie R, 2003, Diabetes Technol Ther, V5, P979, DOI 10.1089/152091503322641024
[9]   Glycated hemoglobin standardization - National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) perspective [J].
Little, RR .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2003, 41 (09) :1191-1198
[10]  
Motulsky H., 1995, INTUITIVE BIOSTATIST