Mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil for second-line treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal

被引:8
作者
Saint, Angelique [1 ]
Evesque, Ludovic [1 ]
Falk, Alexander T. [2 ]
Cavaglione, Gerard [1 ]
Montagne, Lucile [2 ]
Benezery, Karen [2 ]
Francois, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Antoine Lacassagne, Dept Med Oncol, Digest Oncol, Nice, France
[2] Ctr Antoine Lacassagne, Dept Radiat Oncol, Nice, France
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2019年 / 8卷 / 16期
关键词
5-fluorouracil; anal canal; cancer; chemotherapy; metastasis; mitomycin; ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER; SALVAGE THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; COMBINATION; PACLITAXEL; MANAGEMENT; CISPLATIN; FLUOROPYRIMIDINE; CHEMORADIATION; CAPECITABINE;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.2558
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Metastatic squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the anal canal are rare and there is no international consensus on their second-line management. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin in combination with radiotherapy is the standard for locally advanced forms but its efficacy in metastatic stage has never been evaluated. Patients and methods We report a retrospective analysis of patients treated with 5-FU and mitomycin from 2000 to 2017 in our institution for a metastatic SCC of the anal canal after failure of platinum-based regimen. The main outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity. Results Nineteen patients, 15 women and four men, with a median age of 57 years were identified (range, 40-79 years). Patients received a median of three cycles (1-7) of mitomycin . A dose reduction was necessary in six patients (31.6%), one patient had to discontinue treatment following toxicity and no death was due to treatment toxicity was reported. An objective response was observed in five patients (26.4%, 95% CI 6.6-46.2) including one complete response, six patients (31.6%, 95% CI 10.7-52.5) showed tumor stabilization. Median PFS and OS were 3 months [95% CI 1-5] and 7 months [95% CI 2.2-11.8]. Responder had a median duration of response of 4 months [95% CI 1.8-6.1] and one patient had 23 months duration of response. No significant difference was noted for PFS and OS for patients previously treated with mitomycin and 5-FU at a local stage. Conclusion Mitomycin and regimen provides tumor control with acceptable tolerance. It is an option for patients with metastatic SCC of the anal canal after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:6853 / 6859
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Abbas A, 2011, ANTICANCER RES, V31, P4637
  • [2] AJANI JA, 1989, AM J MED, V87, P221
  • [3] Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal - A randomized controlled trial
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    Winter, Kathryn A.
    Gunderson, Leonard L.
    Pedersen, John
    Benson, Al B., III
    Thomas, Charles R., Jr.
    Mayer, Robert J.
    Haddock, Michael G.
    Rich, Tyvin A.
    Willett, Christopher
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (16): : 1914 - 1921
  • [4] [Anonymous], CARBOPLATIN PLUS PAC
  • [5] Anal Carcinoma, Version 2.2018
    Benson, Al B., III
    Venook, Alan P.
    Al-Hawary, Mahmoud M.
    Cederquist, Lynette
    Chen, Yi-Jen
    Ciombor, Kristen K.
    Cohen, Stacey
    Cooper, Harry S.
    Deming, Dustin
    Engstrom, Paul F.
    Grem, Jean L.
    Grothey, Axel
    Hochster, Howard S.
    Hoffe, Sarah
    Hunt, Steven
    Kamel, Ahmed
    Kirilcuk, Natalie
    Krishnamurthi, Smitha
    Messersmith, Wells A.
    Meyerhardt, Jeffrey
    Mulcahy, Mary F.
    Murphy, James D.
    Nurkin, Steven
    Saltz, Leonard
    Sharma, Sunil
    Shibata, David
    Skibber, John M.
    Sofocleous, Constantinos T.
    Stoffel, Elena M.
    Stotsky-Himelfarb, Eden
    Willett, Christopher G.
    Wuthrick, Evan
    Gregory, Kristina M.
    Freedman-Cass, Deborah A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2018, 16 (07): : 852 - 871
  • [6] Management of patients with recurrent/advanced cervical cancer beyond first line platinum regimens: Where do we stand? A literature review
    Boussios, Stergios
    Seraj, Esmeralda
    Zarkavelis, George
    Petrakis, Dimitrios
    Kollas, Aristomenes
    Kafantari, Aikaterini
    Assi, Abraam
    Tatsi, Konstantina
    Pavlidis, Nicholas
    Pentheroudakis, George
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2016, 108 : 164 - 174
  • [7] Das P, INT J RAD ONCOL BIOL, V68, P794
  • [8] Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: a review and synthetic analysis
    de Martel, Catherine
    Ferlay, Jacques
    Franceschi, Silvia
    Vignat, Jerome
    Bray, Freddie
    Forman, David
    Plummer, Martyn
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (06)
  • [9] New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
    Eisenhauer, E. A.
    Therasse, P.
    Bogaerts, J.
    Schwartz, L. H.
    Sargent, D.
    Ford, R.
    Dancey, J.
    Arbuck, S.
    Gwyther, S.
    Mooney, M.
    Rubinstein, L.
    Shankar, L.
    Dodd, L.
    Kaplan, R.
    Lacombe, D.
    Verweij, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) : 228 - 247
  • [10] Anal cancer: Current and future methodology
    Eng, Cathy
    [J]. CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2006, 24 (05) : 535 - 544