Improved magnetogram calibration of Solar Magnetic Field Telescope and its comparison with the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager

被引:21
作者
Bai, X. Y. [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Y. Y. [1 ]
Teng, F. [1 ]
Su, J. T. [1 ]
Mao, X. J. [3 ]
Wang, G. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Astron Observ, Key Lab Solar Act, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Space Sci Ctr, Space Environm Predict Ctr, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Dept Astron, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
line: profiles; polarization; radiative transfer; sunspots; LINE; INVERSION; HUAIROU; HINODE; MEES;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/stu1711
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
In this paper, we try to improve the magnetogram calibration method of the Solar Magnetic Field Telescope (SMFT). The improved calibration process fits the observed full Stokes information, using six points on the profile of Fe I 5324. 18 angstrom line, and the analytical Stokes profiles under the Milne-Eddington atmosphere model, adopting the Levenberg-Marquardt least-squares fitting algorithm. In comparison with the linear calibration methods, which employs one point, there is a large difference in the strength of longitudinal field B-l and transverse field B-t, caused by the non-linear relationship, but the discrepancy is little in the case of inclination and azimuth. We conclude that it is better to deal with the non-linear effects in the calibration of B-l and B-t using six points. Moreover, in comparison with Solar Dynamics Observatory/Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI), SMFT has larger stray light and acquires less magnetic field strength. For vector magnetic fields in two sunspot regions, the magnetic field strength, inclination and azimuth angles between SMFT and HMI are roughly in agreement, with the linear fitted slopes of 0.73/0.7, 0.95/1.04 and 0.99/1.1. In the case of pores and quiet regions (B-l < 600 G), the fitted slopes of the longitudinal magnetic field strength are 0.78 and 0.87, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 55
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Ai G.-X., 1987, PUB BEIJING ASTRON O, V9, P27
[2]   Calibration of Vector Magnetograms with the Chromospheric Mg b2 Line [J].
Bai, X. Y. ;
Deng, Y. Y. ;
Su, J. T. .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2013, 282 (02) :405-418
[3]   VFISV: Very Fast Inversion of the Stokes Vector for the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager [J].
Borrero, J. M. ;
Tomczyk, S. ;
Kubo, M. ;
Socas-Navarro, H. ;
Schou, J. ;
Couvidat, S. ;
Bogart, R. .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2011, 273 (01) :267-293
[4]   The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) Vector Magnetic Field Pipeline: Optimization of the Spectral Line Inversion Code [J].
Centeno, R. ;
Schou, J. ;
Hayashi, K. ;
Norton, A. ;
Hoeksema, J. T. ;
Liu, Y. ;
Leka, K. D. ;
Barnes, G. .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2014, 289 (09) :3531-3547
[5]  
Delbouille L., 1973, Photometric atlas of the solar spectrum from 3000 to 10,000
[6]  
Demidov M., 2011, P IAU S, V273, P374
[7]   Progress in Space Solar Telescope [J].
Deng YuanYong ;
Zhang HongQi .
SCIENCE IN CHINA SERIES G-PHYSICS MECHANICS & ASTRONOMY, 2009, 52 (11) :1655-1659
[8]   Inference of solar magnetic field parameters from data with limited wavelength sampling [J].
Graham, JD ;
Ariste, AL ;
Socas-Navarro, H ;
Tomczyk, S .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2002, 208 (02) :211-232
[9]  
Hale G. E., 1908, APJ, V28, P315
[10]   TRANSFER OF LINE RADIATION IN A MAGNETIC-FIELD [J].
JEFFERIES, J ;
LITES, BW ;
SKUMANICH, A .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 343 (02) :920-935