Treatment initiation with zidovudine-containing potent antiretroviral therapy impairs CD4 cell count recovery but not clinical efficacy

被引:30
作者
Huttner, Angela C.
Kaufmann, Gilbert R.
Battegay, Manuel
Weber, Rainer
Opravil, Milos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Div Infect Dis, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel Hosp, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
CD4 cell percentage; CD4 cell recovery; cohort study; potent antiretroviral therapy; zidovudine;
D O I
10.1097/QAD.0b013e3280f00fd6
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objective: Zidovudine-containing antiretroviral therapy has been associated with a lower rise in absolute CD4 cell counts in several randomized trials. We examined the predictive factors for this phenomenon and assessed its impact on clinical progression during treatment in a large patient cohort. Design: An analysis of data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Methods: All 2177 treatment-naive adults who began potent antiretroviral therapy (ART) between September 1995 and September 2004 were included. Exclusion criteria were previous ART and treatment duration of less than 3 months. Follow-up was censored in the case of a treatment switch or stop. Results: A total of 1312 patients initiated zidovudine-containing ART and 865 started ART without zidovudine. Except for slightly higher absolute CD4 cell counts in the zidovudine group, prognostic characteristics at baseline and viral suppression during treatment did not differ. During an observation time of 2343 and 1486 patient-years, the CD4 cell count increased by a median of 221 versus 286 cells/mu l at 2 years and 290 versus 379 cells/mu l at 4 years in the zidovudine versus no zidovudine group; however, the rise in the percentage of CD4 cells was similar in both groups. The zidovudine group had a significantly slower rise in total lymphocytes and haemoglobin. In multivariable Cox models, the hazard for new HIV-associated clinical events was not affected by zidovudine-containing ART. Conclusion: Over 4 years, zidovudine led to a smaller increase in absolute, but not percentage, CD4 cell counts. The effect can be explained as a slower rise in total lymphocytes and has no impact on clinical efficacy. (C) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 946
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Combined analysis of two-year follow-up from two open-label randomized trials comparing efficacy of three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbones for previously untreated HIV-1 infection: OzCombo 1 and 2 [J].
Amin, J ;
Moore, A ;
Carr, A ;
French, MA ;
Law, M ;
Emery, S ;
Cooper, DA .
HIV CLINICAL TRIALS, 2003, 4 (04) :252-261
[2]   An updated systematic overview of triple combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults [J].
Bartlett, John A. ;
Fath, Michael J. ;
DeMasi, Ralph ;
Hermes, Ashwaq ;
Quinn, Joseph ;
Mondou, Elsa ;
Rousseau, Franck .
AIDS, 2006, 20 (16) :2051-2064
[3]   Coinfection with hepatitis viruses and outcome of initial Antiretroviral regimens in previously naive HIV-Infected subjects [J].
De Luca, A ;
Bugarini, R ;
Lepri, AC ;
Puoti, M ;
Girardi, E ;
Antinori, A ;
Poggio, A ;
Pagano, G ;
Tositti, G ;
Cadeo, G ;
Macor, A ;
Toti, M ;
Monforte, AD .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 162 (18) :2125-2132
[4]   Abacavir versus zidovudine combined with lamivudine and efavirenz, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults [J].
DeJesus, E ;
Herrera, G ;
Teofilo, E ;
Gerstoft, J ;
Buendia, CB ;
Brand, JD ;
Brothers, CH ;
Hernandez, J ;
Castillo, SA ;
Bonny, T ;
Lanier, ER ;
Scott, TR .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (07) :1038-1046
[5]   A comparison of stavudine, didanosine and indinavir with zidovudine, lamivudine and indinavir for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infected individuals: Selection of thymidine analog regimen therapy (START II) [J].
Eron, JJ ;
Murphy, RL ;
Peterson, D ;
Pottage, J ;
Parenti, DM ;
Jemsek, J ;
Swindells, S ;
Sepulveda, G ;
Bellos, N ;
Rashbaum, BC ;
Esinhart, J ;
Schoellkopf, N ;
Grosso, R ;
Stevens, M .
AIDS, 2000, 14 (11) :1601-1610
[6]   An open randomized controlled trial of zidovudine plus lamivudine versus stavudine plus lamivudine [J].
Foudraine, NA ;
de Jong, JJ ;
Weverling, GJ ;
van Benthem, BHB ;
Maas, J ;
Keet, IPM ;
Jurriaans, S ;
Roos, MTL ;
Vandermeulen, K ;
de Wolf, F ;
Lange, JMA .
AIDS, 1998, 12 (12) :1513-1519
[7]  
French Martyn, 2002, HIV Clin Trials, V3, P177
[8]   Response to first protease inhibitor- and efavirenz-containing antiretroviral combination therapy - The Swiss HIV Cohort Study [J].
Friedl, AC ;
Ledergerber, B ;
Flepp, M ;
Hirschel, B ;
Telenti, A ;
Furrer, H ;
Bucher, HC ;
Bernasconi, E ;
Weber, R .
AIDS, 2001, 15 (14) :1793-1800
[9]   Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV [J].
Gallant, JE ;
DeJesus, E ;
Arribas, JR ;
Pozniak, AL ;
Gazzard, B ;
Campo, RE ;
Lu, B ;
McColl, D ;
Chuck, S ;
Enejosa, J ;
Toole, JJ ;
Cheng, AK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (03) :251-260
[10]   Effect of baseline- and treatment-related factors on immunologic recovery after initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-positive subjects: Results from ACTG 384 [J].
Gandhi, Rajesh T. ;
Spritzler, John ;
Chan, Ellen ;
Asmuth, David M. ;
Rodriguez, Benigno ;
Merigan, Thomas C. ;
Hirsch, Martin S. ;
Shafer, Robert W. ;
Robbins, Gregory K. ;
Pollard, Richard B. .
JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2006, 42 (04) :426-434