T1/T2 Matching to Differentiate Tumor Growth From Radiation Effects After Stereotactic Radiosurgery

被引:136
作者
Kano, Hideyuki [1 ,2 ]
Kondziolka, Douglas [1 ,2 ]
Lobato-Polo, Javier [1 ,2 ]
Zorro, Oscar [1 ,2 ]
Flickinger, John C. [2 ,3 ]
Lunsford, L. Dade [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurol Surg, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Ctr Image Guided Neurosurg, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Brain metastases; Cancer; Gamma knife; Imaging; Stereotactic radiosurgery; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; BRAIN METASTASES; MIMICKING TUMOR; RECURRENT TUMOR; VITAMIN-E; NECROSIS; PET; REOPERATION; PROGRESSION; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1227/01.NEU.0000360391.35749.A5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We define magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical criteria that differentiate radiation effect (RE) from tumor progression after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: We correlated postoperative imaging and histopathological data in 68 patients who underwent delayed resection of a brain metastasis after SRS. Surgical resection was required in these patients because of clinical and imaging evidence of lesion progression 0.3 to 27.7 months after SRS. At the time of SRS, the median target volume was 7.1 mL (range, 0.5-26 mL), which increased to 14 mL (range, 1.3-81 mL) at the time of surgery. After initial SRS, routine contrast-enhanced MRI was used to assess tumor response and to detect potential adverse radiation effects. We retrospectively correlated these serial MRIs with the postoperative histopathology to determine if any routine MRI features might differentiate tumor progression from RE. RESULTS: The median time from SRS to surgical resection was 6.9 months (range, 0.3-27.7 months). A shorter interval from SRS to resection was associated with a higher rate of tumor recurrence (P = .014). A correspondence between the contrast-enhanced volume on T1-weighted images and the low signal-defined lesion margin on T2-weighted images ("T1/T2 match") was associated with tumor progression at histopathology (P < .0001). Lack of a clear and defined lesion margin on T2-weighted images compared to the margin of contrast uptake on T1-weighted images ("T1/T2 mismatch") was significantly associated with a higher rate of RE in pathological specimens (P < .0001). The sensitivity of the T1/T2 mismatch in identifying RE was 83.3%, and the specificity was 91.1%. CONCLUSIONS: We found that time to progression and T1/T2 mismatch were able to differentiate tumor progression from RE in most patients. When REs are suspected, surgery may not be necessary if patients respond to conservative measures. When tumor progression is suspected, resection or repeat radiosurgery can be effective, depending on the degree of mass effect.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 491
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC GUIDANCE STEREOTAXIS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INTRACRANIAL MASS LESIONS
    APUZZO, MLJ
    SABSHIN, JK
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 1983, 12 (03) : 277 - 285
  • [2] POSTRADIATION CEREBELLAR NECROSIS MIMICKING TUMOR - MR APPEARANCE
    ASHDOWN, BC
    BOYKO, OB
    UGLIETTA, JP
    FRIEDMAN, HS
    HOCKENBERGER, B
    OAKES, WJ
    FULLER, GN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1993, 17 (01) : 124 - 126
  • [3] Brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery using the Leksell gamma knife:: can FDG PET help to differentiate radionecrosis from tumour progression?
    Belohlávek, P
    Simonova, G
    Kantorova, I
    Novotny, J
    Liscák, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (01) : 96 - 100
  • [4] Analysis of repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for progressive primary and metastatic CNS tumors
    Bhatnagar, A
    Heron, DE
    Kondziolka, D
    Lunsford, LD
    Flickinger, JC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (03): : 527 - 532
  • [5] REOPERATION FOR RECURRENT METASTATIC BRAIN-TUMORS
    BINDAL, RK
    SAWAYA, R
    LEAVENS, ME
    HESS, KR
    TAYLOR, SH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 83 (04) : 600 - 604
  • [6] Chao ST, 2001, INT J CANCER, V96, P191, DOI 10.1002/ijc.1016.abs
  • [7] Chin L., 1993, THOMAS STEREOTACT IM, P49
  • [8] CAN STANDARD MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING RELIABLY DISTINGUISH RECURRENT TUMOR FROM RADIATION NECROSIS AFTER RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES? A RADIOGRAPHIC-PATHOLOGICAL STUDY
    Dequesada, Ivan M.
    Quisling, Ronald G.
    Yachnis, Anthony
    Friedman, William A.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 63 (05) : 898 - 903
  • [9] BRAIN RADIATION LESIONS - MR IMAGING
    DOOMS, GC
    HECHT, S
    BRANTZAWADZKI, M
    BERTHIAUME, Y
    NORMAN, D
    NEWTON, TH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1986, 158 (01) : 149 - 155
  • [10] Protective effects of melatonin and vitamin E in brain damage due to gamma radiation - An experimental study
    Erol, FS
    Topsakal, C
    Ozveren, MF
    Kaplan, M
    Ilhan, N
    Ozercan, IH
    Yildiz, OG
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2004, 27 (01) : 65 - 69