A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of unilateral spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine, ropivacaine, or levobupivacaine for inguinal herniorrhaphy

被引:75
作者
Casati, A
Moizo, E
Marchetti, C
Vinciguerra, F
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Dept Anesthesiol, I-33100 Parma, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, IRCCS, H San Raffaele, Dept Anesthesiol, Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ANE.0000132972.61498.F1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In 60 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, we compared the clinical profile of unilateral spinal anesthesia produced with either 8 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 20),8 mg of hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5% (n = 20), or 12 mg of hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.5% (n = 20). The study drug was injected slowly through a 25-gauge Whitacre directional needle and patients maintained the lateral decubitus position for 15 min. The onset time and intraoperative efficacy were similar in the three groups. The maximal level of sensory block on the operative and nonoperative sides was T6 (T12-5) and L3 (/[no sensory level detectable]-T4) with bupivacaine, T8 (T12-5) and L3 (/-T3) with levobupivacaine, T5 (T10-2) and T11 (/-T3) with ropivacaine (P = 0.11, P = 0.23, respectively). Complete regression of spinal anesthesia occurred after 166 +/- 42 min with ropivacaine, 210 +/- 63 min with levobupivacaine, and 190 +/- 51 min with bupivacaine (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively); however, no differences were observed in time for home discharge (329 +/- 89 min with bupivacaine, 261 +/- 112 min with levobupivacaine, and 332 +/- 57 min with ropivacaine [P = 0.28]). We conclude that 8 mg of levobupivacaine or 12 mg of ropivacaine are acceptable alternatives to 8 mg of bupivacaine when limiting spinal block at the operative side for inguinal hernia repair.
引用
收藏
页码:1387 / 1392
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Hyperbaric spinal levobupivacaine: A comparison to racemic bupivacaine in volunteers
    Alley, EA
    Kopacz, DJ
    McDonald, SB
    Liu, SS
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (01) : 188 - 193
  • [2] [Anonymous], DESIGNING CLIN RES
  • [3] A comparison of minidose lidocaine-fentanyl and conventional-dose lidocaine spinal anesthesia
    Ben-David, B
    Maryanovsky, M
    Gurevitch, A
    Lucyk, C
    Solosko, D
    Frankel, R
    Volpin, G
    DeMeo, PJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (04) : 865 - 870
  • [4] Unilateral spinal block for outpatient knee arthroscopy: A dose-finding study
    Borghi, B
    Stagni, F
    Bugamelli, S
    Paini, MB
    Nepoti, ML
    Montebugnoli, M
    Casati, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2003, 15 (05) : 351 - 356
  • [5] Urinary bladder scanning after day-case arthroscopy under spinal anaesthesia: comparison between lidocaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine
    Breebaart, MB
    Vercauteren, MP
    Hoffmann, VL
    Adriaensen, HA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 90 (03) : 309 - 313
  • [6] Small-dose intrathecal lidocaine versus ropivacaine for anorectal surgery in an ambulatory setting
    Buckenmaier, CC
    Nielsen, KC
    Pietrobon, R
    Klein, SM
    Martin, AH
    Greengrass, RA
    Steele, SM
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (05) : 1253 - 1257
  • [7] Frequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal block
    Casati, A
    Fanelli, G
    Aldegheri, G
    Colnaghi, E
    Casaletti, E
    Cedrati, V
    Torri, G
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1999, 24 (03) : 214 - 219
  • [8] Restricting spinal block to the operative side: Why not?
    Casati, A
    Fanelli, G
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2004, 29 (01) : 4 - 6
  • [9] Casati A, 2001, Minerva Anestesiol, V67, P855
  • [10] Casati Andrea, 2002, Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, V15, P543, DOI 10.1097/00001503-200210000-00012