Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk

被引:76
作者
Arefan, Dooman [1 ]
Mohamed, Aly A. [1 ]
Berg, Wendie A. [1 ,2 ]
Zuley, Margarita L. [1 ,2 ]
Sumkin, Jules H. [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Shandong [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Med Ctr, 300 Halket St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Bioengn & Intelligent Syst Program, Dept Radiol Biomed Informat, 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast cancer; breast density; deep learning; digital mammography; risk biomarkers; DENSITY ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION; HISTOLOGY; SOFTWARE; IMAGES; CNN;
D O I
10.1002/mp.13886
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate two deep learning-based modeling schemes for predicting short-term risk of developing breast cancer using prior normal screening digital mammograms in a case-control setting. Methods We conducted a retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved study on a case-control cohort of 226 patients (including 113 women diagnosed with breast cancer and 113 controls) who underwent general population breast cancer screening. For each patient, a prior normal (i.e., with negative or benign findings) digital mammogram examination [including mediolateral oblique (MLO) view and craniocaudal (CC) view two images] was collected. Thus, a total of 452 normal images (226 MLO view images and 226 CC view images) of this case-control cohort were analyzed to predict the outcome, i.e., developing breast cancer (cancer cases) or remaining breast cancer-free (controls) within the follow-up period. We implemented an end-to-end deep learning model and a GoogLeNet-LDA model and compared their effects in several experimental settings using two mammographic view images and inputting two different subregions of the images to the models. The proposed models were also compared to logistic regression modeling of mammographic breast density. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the model performance metric. Results The highest AUC was 0.73 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.68-0.78; GoogLeNet-LDA model on CC view] when using the whole-breast and was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.67-0.76; GoogLeNet-LDA model on MLO + CC view) when using the dense tissue, respectively, as the model input. The GoogleNet-LDA model significantly (all P < 0.05) outperformed the end-to-end GoogLeNet model in all experiments. CC view was consistently more predictive than MLO view in both deep learning models, regardless of the input subregions. Both models exhibited superior performance than the percent breast density (AUC = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.49-0.59). Conclusions The proposed deep learning modeling approach can predict short-term breast cancer risk using normal screening mammogram images. Larger studies are needed to further reveal the promise of deep learning in enhancing imaging-based breast cancer risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 118
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Deep Learning to Distinguish Recalled but Benign Mammography Images in Breast Cancer Screening [J].
Aboutalib, Sarah S. ;
Mohamed, Aly A. ;
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Zuley, Margarita L. ;
Sumkin, Jules H. ;
Wu, Shandong .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (23) :5902-5909
[2]  
Alain G., 2016, 5 INT C LEARN REPR I
[3]   Automatic breast density classification using neural network [J].
Arefan, D. ;
Talebpour, A. ;
Ahmadinejhad, N. ;
Asl, Kamali .
JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2015, 10
[4]   Multi-space-enabled deep learning of breast tumors improves prediction of distant recurrence risk [J].
Arefan, Dooman ;
Zheng, Bingjie ;
Dabbs, David J. ;
Bhargava, Rohit ;
Wu, Shandong .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: IMAGING INFORMATICS FOR HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH, AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 10954
[5]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[6]  
Bar Y, 2015, I S BIOMED IMAGING, P294, DOI 10.1109/ISBI.2015.7163871
[7]   Deep learning with non-medical training used for chest pathology identification [J].
Bar, Yaniv ;
Diamant, Idit ;
Wolf, Lior ;
Greenspan, Hayit .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 9414
[8]   Deep Learning in Mammography Diagnostic Accuracy of a Multipurpose Image Analysis Software in the Detection of Breast Cancer [J].
Becker, Anton S. ;
Marcon, Magda ;
Ghafoor, Soleen ;
Wurnig, Moritz C. ;
Frauenfelder, Thomas ;
Boss, Andreas .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2017, 52 (07) :434-440
[9]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[10]   Deep learning beyond cats and dogs: recent advances in diagnosing breast cancer with deep neural networks [J].
Burt, Jeremy R. ;
Torosdagli, Neslisah ;
Khosravan, Naji ;
Raviprakash, Harish ;
Mortazi, Aliasghar ;
Tissavirasingham, Fiona ;
Hussein, Sarfaraz ;
Bagci, Ulas .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1089)