The bright side of financial derivatives: Options trading and firm innovation

被引:80
作者
Blanco, Ivan [1 ,2 ]
Wehrheim, David [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CUNEF, Calle Leonardo Prieto Castro 2, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Getafe, Spain
[3] IESE Business Sch, Ave Pearson 21, Barcelona 08034, Spain
关键词
Innovation; R&D productivity; Options market; Price informativeness; Career concerns; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; MANAGERIAL INCENTIVES; PRICE INFORMATIVENESS; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; CAPITAL-MARKETS; STOCK; INVESTMENT; PATENTS; VOLUME; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.04.004
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Do financial derivatives enhance or impede innovation? We answer this question by examining the relationship between equity options markets and standard measures of firm innovation. We find that firms with more options trading activity generate more patents and patent citations per dollar invested in research and development (R&D), after accounting for other confounding factors. These results are confirmed when we use a propensity score matching procedure and an instrumental variable approach to control for the potential endogeneity of options trading. The evidence is consistent with the notion that the enhanced informational efficiency induced by options leads to an improved allocation of corporate resources. We further discuss possible underlying economic mechanisms through which more active options markets boost innovation and show that the effect remains substantial even after controlling for these mechanisms. Considering the average increase in the dollar volume of options traded for our sample firms, we conclude that a 200% move in options volume increases firm innovation by about 31%. 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 119
页数:21
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
ACS ZJ, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P678
[2]   Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Anselin, L ;
Varga, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (07) :1069-1085
[3]   A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability [J].
Admati, Anat R. ;
Pfleiderer, Paul .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1988, 1 (01) :3-40
[4]   Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bloom, N ;
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Howitt, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (02) :701-728
[5]   Innovation and Institutional Ownership [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Zingales, Luigi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :277-304
[6]   DIRECT VALIDATION OF CITATION COUNTS AS INDICATORS OF INDUSTRIALLY IMPORTANT PATENTS [J].
ALBERT, MB ;
AVERY, D ;
NARIN, F ;
MCALLISTER, P .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1991, 20 (03) :251-259
[7]   Credit supply and corporate innovation [J].
Amore, Mario Daniele ;
Schneider, Cedric ;
Zaldokas, Alminas .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 109 (03) :835-855
[8]   The sale of ideas: Strategic disclosure, property rights, and contracting [J].
Anton, JJ ;
Yao, DA .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2002, 69 (03) :513-531
[9]   Corporate Investment and Stock Market Listing: A Puzzle? [J].
Asker, John ;
Farre-Mensa, Joan ;
Ljungqvist, Alexander .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2015, 28 (02) :342-390
[10]   What Matters in Corporate Governance? [J].
Bebchuk, Lucian ;
Cohen, Alma ;
Ferrell, Allen .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (02) :783-827