Exploring the Use of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention Among High-Risk People Who Use Drugs in Treatment

被引:39
作者
Shrestha, Roman [1 ,2 ]
Copenhaver, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Allied Hlth Sci, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Inst Collaborat Hlth Intervent & Policy, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
HIV prevention; pre-exposure prophylaxis; people who use drugs; substance abuse; methadone maintenance program; ANTIRETROVIRAL PROPHYLAXIS; BANGKOK TENOFOVIR; TRANSGENDER WOMEN; INJECT DRUGS; SELF-REPORT; MEN; SEX; ADHERENCE; ACCEPTABILITY; WILLINGNESS;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2018.00195
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Despite unequivocal evidence supporting the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), its scale-up has been gradual overall, and nearly absent among people who use drugs (PWUD). In the present study, we implemented the use of PrEP, as a part of an integrated HIV prevention approach, and explored the experiences and attitudes related to PrEP use among PWUD. Methods: Between September 2016 and July 2017, we recruited 40 HIV-uninfected, methadone-maintained people, who reported HIV-risk behaviors, and were currently taking PrEP. We conducted both quantitative and in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews that primarily focused on experiences, attitudes, acceptability, disclosure status, risk compensation-related attitudes, and barriers related to PrEP adherence. Results: Results showed that participants were highly satisfied and perceived PrEP as valuable and acceptable for HIV prevention. Participants reported high adherence to PrEP. The most highly endorsed facilitators to PrEP adherence were use of memory aids, no out-of-pocket cost, perceived benefit, and support from social network. The barriers to adherence included side-effects, stigmatization, requirement of daily dosing, and accessibility of PrEP services. Additionally, participants expressed disagreement with the overall risk compensation-related attitudes (i.e., decreased personal concern about engaging in HIV risk behavior due to their perception that PrEP is now fully protecting them from contracting HIV) and indicated no increased engagement in risk behaviors while on PrEP. Conclusions: The results from the current study provide preliminary evidence supporting the successful integration of PrEP within the substance abuse treatment setting, where high risk PWUD are concentrated.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Accuracy of Self-Report and Pill-Count Measures of Adherence in the FEM-PrEP Clinical Trial: Implications for Future HIV-Prevention Trials [J].
Agot, Kawango ;
Taylor, Douglas ;
Corneli, Amy L. ;
Wang, Meng ;
Ambia, Julie ;
Kashuba, Angela D. M. ;
Parker, Caleb ;
Lemons, Ansley ;
Malahleha, Mookho ;
Lombaard, Johan ;
Van Damme, Lut .
AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 19 (05) :743-751
[2]   Antiretroviral Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in Heterosexual Men and Women [J].
Baeten, J. M. ;
Donnell, D. ;
Ndase, P. ;
Mugo, N. R. ;
Campbell, J. D. ;
Wangisi, J. ;
Tappero, J. W. ;
Bukusi, E. A. ;
Cohen, C. R. ;
Katabira, E. ;
Ronald, A. ;
Tumwesigye, E. ;
Were, E. ;
Fife, K. H. ;
Kiarie, J. ;
Farquhar, C. ;
John-Stewart, G. ;
Kakia, A. ;
Odoyo, J. ;
Mucunguzi, A. ;
Nakku-Joloba, E. ;
Twesigye, R. ;
Ngure, K. ;
Apaka, C. ;
Tamooh, H. ;
Gabona, F. ;
Mujugira, A. ;
Panteleeff, D. ;
Thomas, K. K. ;
Kidoguchi, L. ;
Krows, M. ;
Revall, J. ;
Morrison, S. ;
Haugen, H. ;
Emmanuel-Ogier, M. ;
Ondrejcek, L. ;
Coombs, R. W. ;
Frenkel, L. ;
Hendrix, C. ;
Bumpus, N. N. ;
Bangsberg, D. ;
Haberer, J. E. ;
Stevens, W. S. ;
Lingappa, J. R. ;
Celum, C. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (05) :399-410
[3]   Behavioral and Biomedical Combination Strategies for HIV Prevention [J].
Bekker, Linda-Gail ;
Beyrer, Chris ;
Quinn, Thomas C. .
COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICINE, 2012, 2 (08)
[4]   The "Safe Sex" Conundrum: Anticipated Stigma From Sexual Partners as a Barrier to PrEP Use Among Substance Using MSM Engaging in Transactional Sex [J].
Biello, Katie B. ;
Oldenburg, Catherine E. ;
Mitty, Jennifer A. ;
Closson, Elizabeth F. ;
Mayer, Kenneth H. ;
Safren, Steven A. ;
Mimiaga, Matthew J. .
AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2017, 21 (01) :300-306
[5]   Motivators, concerns, and barriers to adoption of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among gay and bisexual men in HIV-serodiscordant male relationships [J].
Brooks, Ronald A. ;
Kaplan, Rachel L. ;
Lieber, Eli ;
Landovitz, Raphael J. ;
Lee, Sung-Jae ;
Leibowitz, Arleen A. .
AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2011, 23 (09) :1136-1145
[6]   Combination HIV Prevention Interventions: The Potential of Integrated Behavioral and Biomedical Approaches [J].
Brown, Jennifer L. ;
Sales, Jessica M. ;
DiClemente, Ralph J. .
CURRENT HIV/AIDS REPORTS, 2014, 11 (04) :363-375
[7]   Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and the Promise of Combination Prevention Approaches [J].
Buchbinder, Susan P. ;
Liu, Albert .
AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2011, 15 :S72-S79
[8]  
CDC, 2015, HIV SURV REP DIAGN H
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2021, Prexposure Prophylaxis for the Prevention of HIV Infection in the United States2021 Update, a Clinical Practice Guide
[10]   Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial [J].
Choopanya, Kachit ;
Martin, Michael ;
Suntharasamai, Pravan ;
Sangkum, Udomsak ;
Mock, Philip A. ;
Leethochawalit, Manoj ;
Chiamwongpaet, Sithisat ;
Kitisin, Praphan ;
Natrujirote, Pitinan ;
Kittimunkong, Somyot ;
Chuachoowong, Rutt ;
Gvetadze, Roman J. ;
McNicholl, Janet M. ;
Paxton, Lynn A. ;
Curlin, Marcel E. ;
Hendrix, Craig W. ;
Vanichseni, Suphak .
LANCET, 2013, 381 (9883) :2083-2090