The influence of democracy on emissions and energy efficiency in America: New evidence from quantile regression analysis

被引:51
作者
Chou, Li-Chen [1 ]
Zhang, Wan-Hao [2 ]
Wang, Meng-Ying [3 ]
Yang, Fu-Ming [4 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Business Coll, Dept Econ, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Kings Coll London, Sch Polit & Econ, London, England
[3] Wenzhou Univ, Sch Business, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Wenzhou Business Coll, Dept Finance, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon dioxide emission; energy efficiency; America; democracy; quantile regression; POLITICAL-INSTITUTIONS; INEQUALITY; INCOME; ENVIRONMENT; POLLUTION; ELECTRICITY; PROVISION; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1177/0958305X19882382
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study explores whether the development of democracy can significantly affect CO2 emissions and the energy efficiencies in the countries. Database reference from Freedom House, Polity IV project and World Development Indicator was applied to analyze the relationship between the democracy development, CO2 emissions and the energy efficiency of 26 countries in America from the year 1990 to 2013. Empirical result shows that the deepening democracy has a significant impact on the reduction of national CO2 emissions and brings a positive influence on energy efficiency. The further application of quantile regression also indicates that the influence of democratization on CO2 emissions and countries' energy efficient scores is significant. The empirical results may reflect the reduction of emission or the improvement of energy efficient outcome from the enhancement of democratic institution.
引用
收藏
页码:1318 / 1334
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Analysis of Factors Influencing Energy Efficiency Based on Spatial Quantile Autoregression: Evidence from the Panel Data in China [J].
Zhang, Jinping ;
Lu, Qiuru ;
Guan, Li ;
Wang, Xiaoying .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (02)
[42]   Health and political regimes: Evidence from quantile regression [J].
Okada, Keisuke .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (02) :307-319
[43]   Does active management add value? New evidence from a quantile regression approach [J].
Carlos Matallin-Saez, Juan ;
Soler-Dominguez, Amparo ;
Tortosa-Ausina, Emili .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2019, 70 (10) :1734-1751
[44]   Intra-day dynamics of exchange rates: New evidence from quantile regression [J].
Kuck, Konstantin ;
Maderitsch, Robert .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2019, 71 :247-257
[45]   The asymmetric evolution of economic institutions: evidence from dynamic panel quantile regression with IV and fixed effects [J].
de Souza, Michel Candido ;
Ferreira, Mauro Sayar ;
de Figueiredo, Lizia .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 30 (11) :1531-1539
[46]   How Air Quality Affect Health Industry Stock Returns: New Evidence From the Quantile-on-Quantile Regression [J].
Liu, Lu ;
Wang, Kai-Hua ;
Xiao, Yidong .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
[47]   Does corporate governance influence firm performance? Quantile regression evidence from a transactional economy [J].
Dang, R. A. ;
Houanti, L. ;
Le, N. T. ;
Vu, M. -C. .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 25 (14) :984-988
[48]   Energy security and CO2 emissions: New evidence from time-varying and quantile-varying aspects [J].
Wang, Kai-Hua ;
Zhao, Yan-Xin ;
Su, Yun Hsuan ;
Lobont, Oana-Ramona .
ENERGY, 2023, 273
[49]   OPEC news and predictability of energy futures returns and volatility: evidence from a conditional quantile regression [J].
Derbali, Abdelkader ;
Wu, Shan ;
Jamel, Lamia .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE, 2020, 25 (50) :239-259
[50]   Unveiling the spillover effects of democracy and renewable energy consumption on the environmental quality of BRICS countries: A new insight from different quantile regression approaches [J].
Ghosh, Smarnika ;
Hossain, Md. Shaddam ;
Voumik, Liton Chandra ;
Raihan, Asif ;
Ridzuan, Abdul Rahim ;
Esquivias, Miguel Angel .
RENEWABLE ENERGY FOCUS, 2023, 46 :222-235