Minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for patients with obesity: a propensity score-matched analysis

被引:8
作者
Aziz, Mohamed A. Abd El [1 ]
Calini, Giacomo [1 ]
Grass, Fabian [2 ]
Behm, Kevin T. [1 ]
D'Angelo, Anne-Lise [1 ]
Shawki, Sherief [1 ]
Mathis, Kellie L. [1 ]
Larson, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Dept Surg, 200 First St Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne Univ Hosp CHUV, Dept Visceral Surg, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery; Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; Surgical site infection; Ulcerative colitis; RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY; IMPACT; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-021-02197-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Obesity is a risk factor for failure of pouch surgery completion. However, little is known about the impact of obesity on short-term outcomes after minimally invasive (MIS) ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). This study aimed to assess short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing MIS total proctocolectomy (TPC) with IPAA in patients with and without obesity. Materials and methods All adult patients (>= 18 years old) who underwent MIS IPAA as reported in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Participant User Files 2007 to 2018 were included. Patients were divided according to their body mass index (BMI) into two groups (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) vs. BMI < 30 kg/m(2)). Baseline demographics, preoperative risk factors including comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists Class, smoking, different preoperative laboratory parameters, and operation time were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matching (1:1) based on logistic regression with a caliber distance of 0.2 of the standard deviation of the logit of the propensity score was used to overcome biases due to different distributions of the covariates. Thirty-day postoperative complications including overall surgical and medical complications, surgical site infection (SSI), organ space infection, systemic sepsis, 30-day mortality, and length of stay were compared between both groups. Results Initially, a total of 2158 patients (402 (18.6%) obese and 1756 (81.4%) nonobese patients) were identified. After 1:1 matching, 402 patients remained in each group. Patients with obesity had a higher risk of postoperative organ/space infection (12.9%; vs. 6.5%; p-value 0.002) compared to nonobese patients. There was no difference between the groups regarding the risk of postoperative sepsis, septic shock, need for blood transfusion, wound disruption, superficial SSI, deep SSI, respiratory, renal, major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation), venous thromboembolism, 30-day mortality, and length of stay. Conclusion MIS IPAA can be safely performed in patients with obesity. However, patients with obesity have a 2-fold risk of organ space infection compared to patients without obesity. Loss of weight before MIS IPAA is recommended not only to allow for pouch creation but also to decrease organ space infections.
引用
收藏
页码:2419 / 2424
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Trends and consequences of surgical conversion in the United States
    Abd El Aziz, Mohamed A.
    Grass, Fabian
    Behm, Kevin T.
    D'Angelo, Anne-Lise
    Mathis, Kellie L.
    Dozois, Eric J.
    Larson, David W.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (01): : 82 - 90
  • [2] Colectomy for patients with super obesity: current practice and surgical morbidity in the United States
    Abd El Aziz, Mohamed A.
    Grass, Fabian
    Perry, William
    Behm, Kevin T.
    Shawki, Sherief F.
    Larson, David W.
    Mathis, Kellie L.
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2020, 16 (11) : 1764 - 1769
  • [3] Trends of complications and innovative techniques' utilization for colectomies in the United States
    Abd El Aziz, Mohamed A.
    Grass, Fabian
    Behm, Kevin T.
    Shawki, Sherief
    D'Angelo, Anne-Lise
    Mathis, Kellie L.
    Larson, David W.
    [J]. UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (01) : 101 - 110
  • [4] Restorative Proctectomy With Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Obese Patients
    Canedo, Jorge A.
    Pinto, Rodrigo A.
    McLemore, Elisabeth C.
    Rosen, Lester
    Wexner, Steven D.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (07) : 1030 - 1034
  • [5] Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in obese patients
    Efron, JE
    Uriburu, JP
    Wexner, SD
    Pikarsky, A
    Hamel, C
    Weiss, EG
    Nogueras, JJ
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2001, 11 (03) : 246 - 251
  • [6] Quantification of risk for pouch failure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery
    Fazio, VW
    Tekkis, PP
    Remzi, F
    Lavery, IC
    Manilich, E
    Connor, J
    Preen, M
    Delaney, CP
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (04) : 605 - 614
  • [7] Preoperative Nutritional Conditioning of Crohn's Patients-Systematic Review of Current Evidence and Practice
    Grass, Fabian
    Pache, Basile
    Martin, David
    Hahnloser, Dieter
    Demartines, Nicolas
    Hubner, Martin
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2017, 9 (06)
  • [8] Obesity Does Not Impact Perioperative or Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Guardado, Jesse
    Carchman, Evie
    Danicic, Ashley E.
    Salgado, Javier
    Watson, Andrew R.
    Celebrezze, James P.
    Medich, David S.
    Holder-Murray, Jennifer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 20 (04) : 725 - 733
  • [9] Impact of BMI on Ability to Successfully Create an IPAA
    Khasawneh, Mohammad A.
    McKenna, Nicholas P.
    Abdelsattar, Zaid M.
    Johnson, Angela
    Dozois, Eric J.
    Pemberton, John H.
    Mathis, Kellie L.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (11) : 1034 - 1038
  • [10] Complications and functional results after ileoanal pouch formation in obese patients
    Kiran, R. P.
    Remzi, F. H.
    Fazio, V. W.
    Lavery, I. C.
    Church, J. M.
    Strong, S. A.
    Hull, T. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2008, 12 (04) : 668 - 674