Multi-criteria Approach for Selecting the Best Solid Waste Management Technologies

被引:0
作者
Latifah, A. M. [1 ]
Basri, Hassan [2 ]
Basri, Noor Ezlin Ahmad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fak Pengajian Alam Sekitar, Jabatan Sains Alam Sekitar, Upm Serdang 43400, Selangor DE, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fak Kejuruteraan & Alam Bina, Jabatan Kejuruteraan Awam & Struktur, Bangi 43600, Selangor DE, Malaysia
来源
SAINS MALAYSIANA | 2010年 / 39卷 / 03期
关键词
Analytical hierarchy process; solid waste management; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; DECISION-SUPPORT; ALTERNATIVES; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The growth in urbanization and industrial activities has caused solid waste management problems. As a solution the integrated approach has been chosen to manage the solid waste. Developing and implementing integrated solid waste management involve combined technologies and alternatives which are suitable with local laws condition. This research showed that Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) has the potential as a decision making tool that can be used in selecting process of solid waste management technology. Three levels hierarchy was developed with the goal at the top level, followed by criteria and alternatives. By using this technique, the priority of each considered technology will be determined where technology with the highest priority is more suitable to be developed. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to test the sensitivity of final decision towards inconsistency of judgement. Application of AHP to determine priority in selecting solid waste management technology was explained in this research based on a case study in the Port Dickson Municipal Council. Analysis of result showed that the combination of recycling technology and composting are suitable to be applied in the Port Dickson district.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 422
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   FUZZINESS IN GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION-SYSTEMS - CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
BANAI, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1993, 7 (04) :315-329
[2]  
Barker SLR., 2001, ADV ENV CHEM SENSING, P1
[3]   A multi-criteria decision approach to choosing the optimal blanching-freezing system [J].
Bevilacqua, M ;
D'Amore, A ;
Polonara, F .
JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2004, 63 (03) :253-263
[4]  
Cheng E. W. L., 2001, Measuring Business Excellence, V5, P30, DOI [DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000005864, 10.1108/EUM0000000005864]
[5]  
Cho KT, 2004, EUR J OPER RES, V156, P420, DOI [10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00907-4, 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00907-4]
[6]   Evaluating waste management alternatives by the multiple criteria approach [J].
Chung, SS ;
Poon, CS .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1996, 17 (03) :189-210
[7]   INCREASING THE UTILIZATION OF SOLAR-ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES (SET) IN JORDAN - ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
ELKARMI, F ;
MUSTAFA, I .
ENERGY POLICY, 1993, 21 (09) :978-982
[8]  
FARBER S, 2000, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V3, P491
[9]  
GLEASON JM, 1999, P 4 ANN INT C IND EN
[10]   Decision support for energy conservation promotion: an analytic hierarchy process approach [J].
Kablan, MM .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (10) :1151-1158