A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators of Disability Disclosure and Accommodations for Youth in Post-Secondary Education

被引:36
作者
Lindsay, Sally [1 ,2 ]
Cagliostro, Elaine [2 ]
Carafa, Gabriella [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Bloorview Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Child Dev Programme, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Accommodations; adolescent; college; disclosure; post-secondary; review; self-advocacy; youth; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; LEARNING-DISABILITIES; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS; TRANSITION SERVICES; SUPPORTING STUDENTS; DISABLED STUDENTS; HEALTH ISSUES; EXPERIENCES; PERSPECTIVES; EMPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.1080/1034912X.2018.1430352
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This review critically appraised the literature on disability disclosure and accommodations for youth with disabilities in post-secondary education (PSE). Systematic searches of 8 databases identified 36 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. These studies were analysed with respect to the characteristics of the participants, methodology, results of the studies and quality of evidence. Five thousand, one hundred and seventy four participants (mean age 26.4) were represented across six countries. Barriers to disability disclosure and requests for accommodations in PSE included stigma, discrimination, lack of knowledge of supports and how to access them, type of course and instructor, coping styles, and nature of the disability. Facilitators included supports and resources, coping and self-advocacy skills, mentorship, and realising the benefits of disclosure. Factors affecting the process and timing of disability disclosure in PSE included the type of disability, and mode of disclosure. There was a lack of consensus on the timing of disclosure.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 556
页数:31
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], J OCCUPATIONAL PSYCH
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, J POSTSEC ED DIS
  • [4] [Anonymous], INT J SPECIAL ED
  • [5] [Anonymous], POSITION PAPER
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, INTRO METAANALYSIS, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9780470743386.CH13, 10.1002/9780470743386.ch13]
  • [7] [Anonymous], ED LAW J
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2008, EQ ACC SUCC QUAL HIG
  • [9] [Anonymous], OFF POSTS ED PROGR
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2004, Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. (HTA Initiative #13), DOI DOI 10.7939/R37M04F16