A Comparative, Single-Blind, Randomized Trial of Pain Associated with Suction or Non-Suction Drains after Gynecologic Laparoscopy

被引:6
作者
Raymond, Andrew P. [1 ]
Chan, Karen [1 ]
Deans, Rebecca [1 ]
Bradbury, Robyn [1 ]
Vancaillie, Thierry G. [1 ]
Abbott, Jason A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Drainage; Gynecologic laparoscopy; Non-suction drain; Pain; Suction drain;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2009.04.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To estimate the difference in pain associated with the wearing or removal of suction or non-suction drains after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Design: A randomized controlled trial from August 2006 through October 2007 (Canadian Task Force Classification I). Setting: Royal Hospital for Women, Department of Endo-Gynaecology and School of Women's and Children's Health University of New South Wales, Patients: A total of 168 women undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy requiring postoperative drainage. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either a suction or non-suction drain after surgery. Measurements and Main Results: Pain was assessed before, during, and after drain removal with a 4-point verbal descriptor scale and 10-cm visual analogue scale. Visual analogue scale and verbal descriptor scale scores for suction versus non-suction groups were 3 versus 3 (p = .654) and 1 versus 1 (p = .686) before removal, 9 versus 7 (p = .016) and 3 versus 2 (p = .029) during removal, and 7 versus 5 (p = .058) and 2 versus 2 (p = .122) after removal. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in patient discomfort while wearing or after removal of suction or non-suction drains. However, suction drains are more painful to have removed. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2010) 17, 16-20 (C) 2010 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 20
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Intraperitoneal gas drain to reduce pain after laparoscopy: Randomized masked trial
    Abbott, J
    Hawe, J
    Srivastava, P
    Hunter, D
    Garry, R
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (01) : 97 - 100
  • [2] ABDOMINAL-PAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPY - THE VALUE OF A GAS DRAIN
    ALEXANDER, JI
    HULL, MGR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1987, 94 (03): : 267 - 269
  • [3] Residual pelvic fluid using two types of drains at laparoscopy - A randomized controlled trial
    Chan, Karen
    Welsh, Alec
    Abbott, Jason
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (06) : 1293 - 1297
  • [4] Crowther C, 1995, GYNAECOL ENDOSC, V4, P53
  • [5] Systematic reviews in health care -: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
    Jüni, P
    Altman, DG
    Egger, M
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7303): : 42 - 46
  • [6] MOORE KL, 1999, CLIN ORIENTED ANATOM, P235
  • [7] Ngo QD, 2004, DROWNING DRAINAGE LI
  • [8] THE IMPACT OF BLINDING ON THE RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS CLINICAL-TRIAL
    NOSEWORTHY, JH
    EBERS, GC
    VANDERVOORT, MK
    FARQUHAR, RE
    YETISIR, E
    ROBERTS, R
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1994, 44 (01) : 16 - 20
  • [9] A prospective, randomized study of closed-suction drainage after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy
    Shen, CC
    Huang, FJ
    Hsu, TY
    Weng, HH
    Chang, HW
    Chang, SY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2002, 9 (03): : 346 - 352
  • [10] A prospective randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial to assess whether gas drains reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopy
    Swift, G
    Healey, M
    Varol, N
    Maher, P
    Hill, D
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 42 (03) : 267 - 270