Differential effect of sample preservation methods on plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal DNA

被引:45
|
作者
Bainard, L. D. [1 ]
Klironomos, J. N. [2 ]
Hart, M. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Integrat Biol, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Biol & Phys Geog Unit, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; DNA preservation; Real-time PCR; Glomus intraradices; FIELD PRESERVATION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR-IDENTIFICATION; GLOMUS-INTRARADICES; DIVERSITY; ROOTS; GLOMEROMYCOTA; COLONIZATION; EXTRACTION; SOILS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2010.05.001
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A wide range of methods are commonly used for preserving environmental samples prior to molecular analyses. However, the effect of these preservation methods on fungal DNA is not understood. The objective of this study was to test the effect of eight different preservation methods on the quality and yield of DNA extracted from Bromus inermis and Daucus carota roots colonized by the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus, Glomus intraradices. The total DNA concentration in sample extracts was quantified using spectrophotometry. Samples that were frozen (-80 degrees C and -20 degrees C), stored in 95% ethanol, or silica gel dried yielded total (plant and fungal) DNA concentrations that were not significantly different from fresh samples. In contrast, samples stored in CTAB solution or freeze-dried resulted in significantly reduced DNA concentrations compared with fresh samples. The preservation methods had no effect on the purity of the sample extracts for both plant species. However, the DNA of the dried samples (silica gel dried, freeze-dried, heat dried) appeared to be slightly more degraded compared with samples that remained hydrated (frozen, stored in ethanol or CTAB solutions) during storage when visualized on a gel. The concentration of AM fungal DNA in sample extracts was quantified using TaqMan real time PCR. Methods that preserved samples in hydrated form had similar AM fungal DNA concentrations as fresh samples, except D. carota samples stored in ethanol. In contrast, preservation methods that involved drying the samples had very low concentrations of AM fungal DNA for B. inermis, and nearly undetectable for D. carota samples. The drying process appears to be a major factor in the degradation of AM fungal DNA while having less of an impact on plant DNA. Based on these results, samples that need to be preserved prior to molecular analysis of AM fungi should be kept frozen to minimize the degradation of plant and AM fungal DNA. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 130
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Wheat dwarfing reshapes plant and fungal development in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis
    Alaux, Pierre-Louis
    Courty, Pierre-Emmanuel
    Freville, Helene
    David, Jacques
    Rocher, Aline
    Taschen, Elisa
    MYCORRHIZA, 2024, 34 (04) : 351 - 360
  • [22] Effects of plant neighborhood on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal attributes in afforested zones
    Chen, Xuedong
    Tang, Ming
    Zhang, Xinlu
    Hamel, Chantal
    Liu, Shuo
    Huo, Yandan
    Sheng, Min
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 422 : 253 - 262
  • [23] Plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities - which drives which?
    Zobel, Martin
    Oepik, Maarja
    JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (05) : 1133 - 1140
  • [24] The impact of dispersal, plant genotype and nematodes on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization
    Rasmussen, Pil U.
    Chareesri, Anupol
    Neilson, Roy
    Bennett, Alison E.
    Tack, Ayco J. M.
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 132 : 28 - 35
  • [25] Intraspecific plant interaction affects arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species richness
    Qian Zhang
    Roger T. Koide
    Junxiang Liu
    Zhenjian Li
    Zhenyuan Sun
    Qixiang Sun
    Haishui Yang
    Plant and Soil, 2022, 470 : 141 - 152
  • [26] Codependency between plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities: what is the evidence?
    Kokkoris, Vasilis
    Lekberg, Ylva
    Antunes, Pedro M.
    Fahey, Catherine
    Fordyce, James A.
    Kivlin, Stephanie N.
    Hart, Miranda M.
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2020, 228 (03) : 828 - 838
  • [27] Plant traits determine the phylogenetic structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities
    Lopez-Garcia, Alvaro
    Varela-Cervero, Sara
    Vasar, Martti
    Opik, Maarja
    Barea, Jose M.
    Azcon-Aguilar, Concepcion
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2017, 26 (24) : 6948 - 6959
  • [28] Intraspecific plant interaction affects arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species richness
    Zhang, Qian
    Koide, Roger T.
    Liu, Junxiang
    Li, Zhenjian
    Sun, Zhenyuan
    Sun, Qixiang
    Yang, Haishui
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2022, 470 (1-2) : 141 - 152
  • [29] Suppression of fungal and nematode plant pathogens through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
    Veresoglou, Stavros D.
    Rillig, Matthias C.
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 8 (02) : 214 - 217
  • [30] Paternal arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal status affects DNA methylation in seeds
    Varga, Sandra
    Soulsbury, Carl D.
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 13 (09)