Association between menopausal symptoms and relationship distress

被引:15
作者
Kling, Juliana M. [1 ]
Kelly, Megan [2 ]
Rullo, Jordan [3 ]
Kapoor, Ekta [3 ,4 ]
Kuhle, Carol L. [3 ]
Vegunta, Suneela [1 ]
Mara, Kristin C. [5 ]
Faubion, Stephanie S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Womens Hlth Internal Med, 13737 N 92nd St, Scottsdale, AZ 85260 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Gen Internal Med, Menopause & Womens Sexual Hlth Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Endocrinol Diabet Metab & Nutr, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
Menopause symptoms; Menopause; Relationship distress; MARITAL SATISFACTION; DEPRESSION; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.09.006
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the association between relationship distress and menopausal symptoms. Study design: A retrospective analysis was conducted of questionnaires completed by women 40-65 years of age seeking menopause or sexual health consultation between May, 2015 and May, 2017. Main outcome measures: Associations between menopausal symptoms assessed using the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) and relationship distress measured on the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMSS) were evaluated with two-sample t-tests. Linear regression was used to assess associations after adjusting for potential confounders. Results: The sample of 1884 women averaged 53 years of age (SD = 6.1); most were white (95%), employed (66%), married (90%), and well-educated ( >= college graduate, 64%). Women reporting no relationship distress (KMSS >= 17) had less severe menopausal symptoms overall compared with women reporting relationship distress (total MRS score 13.1 vs 16.0, P < 0.001), with similar findings in each MRS domain. In multivariable analyses, this relationship persisted for total MRS scores and for psychological symptoms among women with no relationship distress, who scored an estimated 1.15 points (95% CI 0.52-1.78) lower on the total MRS and 0.82 points (95% CI 0.53-1.10) lower in the psychological symptom. Conclusions: The absence of relationship distress was associated with less severe menopausal symptoms, particularly in the psychological domain, in women presenting to a women's health clinic. Given the cross = sectional design, the direction of the relationship is unknown.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Change in health-related quality of life over the menopausal transition in a multiethnic cohort of middle-aged women: Study of Women's Health Across the Nation [J].
Avis, Nancy E. ;
Colvin, Alicia ;
Bromberger, Joyce T. ;
Hess, Rachel ;
Matthews, Karen A. ;
Ory, Marcia ;
Schocken, Miriam .
MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2009, 16 (05) :860-869
[2]  
Bernhard L A, 1993, J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, V22, P456, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1993.tb01829.x
[3]  
Bodenmann G, 1997, EUR REV APPL PSYCHOL, V47, P137
[4]   Establishing criterion scores for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale [J].
Crane, DR ;
Middleton, KC ;
Bean, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 2000, 28 (01) :53-60
[5]   MENOPAUSE, AGING AND FAMILY [J].
CRAWFORD, MP ;
HOOPER, D .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1973, 7 (06) :469-482
[6]   Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults US Preventive Services Task Force Final Recommendation Statement [J].
Curry, Susan J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 320 (16) :1678-1687
[7]  
de Montigny Guathier L., 2018, J MARITAL FAM THER, DOI [10.1110/jmft.12345, DOI 10.1110/JMFT.12345]
[8]  
Deeks A, 1998, Climacteric, V1, P271, DOI 10.3109/13697139809085554
[9]   MARITAL SATISFACTION, DEPRESSION, AND ATTRIBUTIONS - A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS [J].
FINCHAM, FD ;
BRADBURY, TN .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 64 (03) :442-452
[10]   MEASURING MARITAL SATISFACTION IN 3 GENERATIONS - POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE DIMENSIONS [J].
GILFORD, R ;
BENGTSON, V .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1979, 41 (02) :387-398