Prevention of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:15
|
作者
Adrien, Crestani [1 ]
Katia, Mahiou [1 ]
Marie-Lucile, Bodet [1 ]
Alice, Roosen [1 ]
Claire, Bonneau [1 ]
Roman, Rouzier [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, F-92210 St Cloud, France
[2] Univ Paris Saclay, Univ Versailles SQY, UFR Sci Sante Simone Veil, Paris, France
[3] Inst Curie, INSERM, U900, St Cloud, France
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2022年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
MODIFIED RADICAL-MASTECTOMY; NODE DISSECTION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; DRAINAGE; COMPLICATIONS; SCALPEL;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-13831-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Seroma or lymphocele remains the most common complication after mastectomy and lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Many different techniques are available to prevent this complication: wound drainage, reduction of the dead space by flap fixation, use of various types of energy, external compression dressings, shoulder immobilization or physical activity, as well as numerous drugs and glues. We searched MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for publications addressing the issue of prevention of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy. Quality was assessed using Hawker's quality assessment tool. Incidence of seroma or lymphocele were collected. Fifteen randomized controlled trials including a total of 1766 patients undergoing radical mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer were retrieved. The incidence of lymphocele or seroma in the study population was 24.2% (411/1698): 25.2% (232/920) in the test groups and 23.0% (179/778) in the control groups. Neither modification of surgical technique (RR 0.86; 95% CI [0.72, 1.03]) nor application of a medical treatment (RR 0.96; 95% CI [0.72, 1.29]) was effective in preventing lymphocele. On the contrary, decreasing the drainage time increased the risk of lymphocele (RR 1.88; 95% CI [1.43, 2.48). There was no publication bias but the studies were of medium to low quality. To conclude, despite the heterogeneity of study designs, drainage appears to be the most effective technique, although the overall quality of the data is low.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Barrier films or dressings for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Wong, Henry C. Y.
    Lee, Shing Fung
    Caini, Saverio
    Chan, Adrian Wai
    Kwan, Jennifer Y. Y.
    Waddle, Mark
    Sonis, Stephen
    Herst, Patries
    Alcorn, Sara
    Bonomo, Pierluigi
    Wong, Cindy
    Corbin, Kimberly
    Choi, J. Isabelle
    Rembielak, Agata
    Alkhaifi, Muna
    Marta, Gustavo Nader
    Rades, Dirk
    van den Hurk, Corina
    Wolf, Julie Ryan
    Chan, Raymond J.
    Schmeel, Leonard Christopher
    Lock, Michael
    Hijal, Tarek
    Cao, Jeffrey
    Kim, Hayeon
    Chow, Edward
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, : 477 - 496
  • [32] Comparison of peritoneal interposition flaps and sealants for prevention of lymphocele after robotic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a systematic review, meta-analysis, Bayesian network meta-analysis, and meta-regression
    Hinojosa-Gonzalez, David E.
    Saffati, Gal
    Kronstedt, Shane
    La, Troy
    Chiu, Cedrick
    Wahlstedt, Eric
    Jones, Jeffrey A.
    Kadmon, Dov
    Badal, Justin
    Taylor, Jennifer M.
    Slawin, Jeremy R.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [33] Incidence of lower limb lymphedema after vulvar cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Jiuzuo
    Yu, Nanze
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Long, Xiao
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (46)
  • [34] Ultrasonic dissection versus electrocautery in mastectomy for breast cancer - A meta-analysis
    Currie, A.
    Chong, K.
    Davies, G. L.
    Cummins, R. S.
    EJSO, 2012, 38 (10): : 897 - 901
  • [35] Comparing open and video endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Suartz, Caio Vinicius
    de Lima, Richard Dobrucki
    Abud, Luiza Rafih
    Brito, Pedro Henrique Souza
    Galhardo, Ketlyn Assuncao
    Talizin, Thalita Bento
    Salazar, Andre Lopes
    Korkes, Fernando
    Guglielmetti, Giuliano
    Zequi, Stenio de Cassio
    Ribeiro-Filho, Leopoldo Alves
    Toren, Paul
    Lodde, Michele
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 135 (04) : 567 - 576
  • [36] Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for resectable breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leal, Frederico
    Liutti, Vitor Teixeira
    Antunes dos Santos, Vivian Castro
    Novis de Figueiredo, Maximiliano Augusto
    Macedo, Ligia Traldi
    Rinck Junior, Jose Augusto
    Sasse, Andre Deeke
    BREAST, 2015, 24 (04) : 406 - 412
  • [37] Diabetes mellitus and prognosis in women with breast cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Xiao-Bo
    Ren, Guo-Sheng
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (49) : e5602
  • [38] Serratus Plane Block in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Zhen-Hao
    Hong, Wei-Jin
    Guo, Xiao-Liang
    Li, Xin-Rui
    Jiang, Xuan-Yu
    Jiang, Yu
    Luo, Sheng-Kang
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2023, 23 (01) : E1 - E13
  • [39] Fibrin Sealants and Quilting Suture for Prevention of Seroma Formation Following Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Harvest: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kyeong-Tae Lee
    Goo-Hyun Mun
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2015, 39 : 399 - 409
  • [40] Systematic review and meta-analysis of pain management after tonsillectomy
    Geissler, Katharina
    Scham, Daniel
    Meissner, Winfried
    Schlattmann, Peter
    Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):