Effect of tillage treatments on soil thermal conductivity for some Jordanian clay loam and loam soils

被引:54
作者
Abu-Hamdeh, NH [1 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Agr Engn & Technol Dept, Irbid, Jordan
关键词
soil thermal conductivity; single probe; rotary tillage; no-tillage; chisel tillage;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00129-X
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil thermal conductivity determines how a soil warms or cools with exchange of energy by conduction, convection, and radiation. The ability to monitor soil thermal conductivity is an important tool in managing the soil temperature regime to affect seed germination and crop growth. In this study, the temperature-by-time data was obtained using a single probe device to determine the soil thermal conductivity. The device was used in the field in some Jordanian clay loam and loam soils to estimate their thermal conductivities under three different tillage treatments to a depth of 20 cm. Tillage treatments were: no-tillage, rotary tillage, and chisel tillage. For the same soil type, the results showed that rotary tillage decreased soil thermal conductivity more than chisel tillage, compared to no-tillage plots. For the clay loam, thermal conductivity ranged from 0.33 to 0.72 W m(-1) K-1 in chisel plowed treatments, from 0.30 to 0.48 W m(-1) K-1 in rotary plowed treatments, and from 0.45 to 0.78 W m(-1) K-1 in no-till treatments. For the loam, thermal conductivity ranged from 0.40 to 0.75 W m(-1) K-1 in chisel Flowed treatments, from 0.34 to 0.57 W m(-1) K-1 in rotary plowed treatments, and from 0.50 to 0.79 W m(-1) K-1 in no-till treatments. The clay loam generally had lower thermal conductivity than loam in all similar tillage treatments. The thermal conductivity measured in this study for each tillage system, in each soil type, was compared with independent estimates based an standard procedures where soil properties are used to model thermal conductivity. The results of this study showed that thermal conductivity varied with soil texture and tillage treatment used and that differences between the modeled and measured thermal conductivities were very small. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 151
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AL NAKSHABANDI G., 1965, Agric. Met., V2, P271, DOI 10.1016/0002-1571(65)90013-0
[2]   COMPARISON OF SINGLE AND DUAL PROBES FOR MEASURING SOIL THERMAL-PROPERTIES WITH TRANSIENT HEATING [J].
BRISTOW, KL ;
WHITE, RD ;
KLUITENBERG, GJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1994, 32 (03) :447-464
[3]   TEST OF A HEAT-PULSE PROBE FOR MEASURING CHANGES IN SOIL-WATER CONTENT [J].
BRISTOW, KL ;
CAMPBELL, GS ;
CALISSENDORFF, K .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1993, 57 (04) :930-934
[4]   MEASUREMENT OF SOIL THERMAL-PROPERTIES WITH A DUAL-PROBE HEAT-PULSE TECHNIQUE [J].
BRISTOW, KL ;
KLUITENBERG, GJ ;
HORTON, R .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (05) :1288-1294
[5]  
Campbell G. S., 1985, Soil physics with BASIC. Transport models for soil-plant systems.
[6]   PROBE FOR MEASURING SOIL SPECIFIC-HEAT USING A HEAT-PULSE METHOD [J].
CAMPBELL, GS ;
CALISSENDORFF, C ;
WILLIAMS, JH .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1991, 55 (01) :291-293
[7]   THERMAL PROPERTIES OF A PUMIC SOIL [J].
COCHRAN, PH ;
BOERSMA, L ;
YOUNGBER.CT .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1967, 31 (04) :454-&
[8]  
DE VRIES D. A., 1958, Aust. J. Phys., V11, P409
[9]  
de Vries D.A., 1963, PHYS PLANT ENV, P210, DOI DOI 10.12691/AEES-2-2-1.
[10]  
DEVRIES DA, 1952, THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY, P52