Societal effects of transdisciplinary sustainability research-How can they Chock forbe strengthened during the research process?

被引:78
作者
Lux, Alexandra [1 ,3 ]
Schaefer, Martina [2 ]
Bergmann, Matthias [1 ]
Jahn, Thomas [1 ,3 ]
Marg, Oskar [1 ]
Nagy, Emilia [2 ]
Ransiek, Anna-Christin [2 ,4 ]
Theiler, Lena [1 ]
机构
[1] ISOE Inst Social Ecol Res, Hamburger Allee 45, D-60486 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Ctr Technol & Soc, Hardenbergstr 16-18, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[3] Senckenberg Biodivers & Climate Res Ctr SBiK F, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Arnimallee 6, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Transdisciplinarity; Societal effects; Potential for effectiveness; Participation; Knowledge integration; SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; IMPACTS; INTERDISCIPLINARY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Transdisciplinary sustainability research aims to mitigate or to solve complex societal problems and advance the production of scientific knowledge. Reflexive approaches to transdisciplinary research processes are outlined to systematically strengthen the potential for societal effectiveness. So far, it is rare to find empirically based analyses of the links between the quality of the research process and the methods applied on the one hand and the effects achieved on the other. This paper thus addresses the issue of heightening the societal effects of transdisciplinary sustainability research. The objective is to explore ways of consciously promoting societal effectiveness in transdisciplinary research. We argue that these possibilities evolve at the intersection between the general project framework and an adaptive shaping of transdisciplinary research processes. A reflexive approach of this kind proactively considers the dynamics of interests and concerns, roles and responsibilities, the collaboration culture within a project, and the connectivity to the context of action addressed. Its deployment presupposes an appreciation of the basic conditions, i.e. the historical development of the respective problem, the heterogeneity of actors involved, the general environment and, finally, the funding conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 191
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Outcomes and Impacts of Development Interventions Toward Conceptual Clarity [J].
Belcher, Brian ;
Palenberg, Markus .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2018, 39 (04) :478-495
[2]   Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context [J].
Belcher, Brian M. ;
Rasmussen, Katherine E. ;
Kemshaw, Matthew R. ;
Zornes, Deborah A. .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2016, 25 (01) :1-17
[3]  
Bennett L.M., 2010, COLLABORATION TEAM S
[4]  
Bergmann M., 2005, Quality Criteria of Transdisciplinary Research. A Guide for the Formative Evaluation of Research Projects
[5]  
Bergmann M., 2012, Methods for transdisciplinary research
[6]   The reality of transdisciplinarity: a framework-based self-reflection from science and practice leaders [J].
Binder, Claudia R. ;
Absenger-Helmli, Iris ;
Schilling, Thorsten .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2015, 10 (04) :545-562
[7]   Assessing the impact of research on policy: a literature review [J].
Boaz, Annette ;
Fitzpatrick, Siobhan ;
Shaw, Ben .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2009, 36 (04) :255-270
[8]   What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey [J].
Bornmann, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (02) :217-233
[9]   A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science [J].
Brandt, Patric ;
Ernst, Anna ;
Gralla, Fabienne ;
Luederitz, Christopher ;
Lang, Daniel J. ;
Newig, Jens ;
Reinert, Florian ;
Abson, David J. ;
von Wehrden, Henrik .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 92 :1-15
[10]   The TD Wheel: A heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research [J].
Carew, Anna L. ;
Wickson, Fern .
FUTURES, 2010, 42 (10) :1146-1155