Evaluation of a Leveling System for a Weeding Robot under Field Condition

被引:7
作者
Chen, Lin [1 ]
Karkee, Manoj [2 ]
He, Long [3 ]
Wei, Yunlong [4 ]
Zhang, Qin [5 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Prosser, WA 99350 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Ctr Precis & Automated Agr Syst, Biol Syst Engn, Prosser, WA 99350 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, University Pk, PA 16801 USA
[4] Fuzhou Univ, Coll Phys & Informat Engn, Fj 350108, Peoples R China
[5] Washington State Univ, Ctr Precis & Automated Agr Syst, Prosser, WA 99350 USA
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2018年 / 51卷 / 17期
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
weeding robot; leveling; angle control; system performance; field experiment;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.194
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Weed control is a huge problem in organic vegetable farming. Even though there are machines available for inter-row weeding, manual weeding is the only choice for adequately controlling weeds, particularly in the space between plants (also called intra-row weeding). Unfortunately, manual weeding is highly labor intensive and costly. Robotic or automatic weeding would be one of the potential solutions for solving the problem. However, some of the technical challenges need to be removed for automatic weeding. One of such technical challenges is that the weeding end-effector needs to reach target precisely to remove weeds located very close to the plant while the robotic vehicle is continuously moving on a generally uneven and uncertain field surfaces. This study was aimed at assessing the performance of an end-effector auto-leveling system designed to accurately control the position of weeding end-effectors during field operations in vegetable crops. The performance assessment was conducted via a set of field experiments using a specifically designed and fabricated robotic platform with leveling system. To achieve the desired level of performance in actual field conditions, the prototype system required to maintain the end-effector base at horizontal position within a +/- 0.25 degrees angular error when the prototype is operating under a field condition causing up to -11 degrees to 11 degrees variation in roll and pitch angles. The test results verified that the developed end-effector base leveling system could maintain the drift of the end effector tip position within 18 mm, and maintain the roll and pitch angular error within 0.2 degrees. Meanwhile, based on the concept of proof research, it is safe to say the corresponding position error caused by angular error of the leveling plate was limited in 1 mm when the leveling plate at a height of 50 cm under field condition. The experiment results can prove that the leveling system can efficiently reduce the effect of the rough field. (C) 2018, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 373
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Amir G., 2006, WORLD AUT C WAC 24 2
  • [2] An agricultural mobile robot with vision-based perception for mechanical weed control
    Åstrand, B
    Baerveldt, AJ
    [J]. AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS, 2002, 13 (01) : 21 - 35
  • [3] Bakker T, 2006, SPRINGER TRAC ADV RO, V25, P579
  • [4] Weed Ecology and Nonchemical Management under Strip-Tillage: Implications for Northern US Vegetable Cropping Systems
    Brainard, Daniel C.
    Peachey, R. Edward
    Haramoto, Erin R.
    Luna, John M.
    Rangarajan, Anusuya
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 27 (01) : 218 - 230
  • [5] History of chemical weeding from 1944 to 2011 in France: Changes and evolution of herbicide molecules
    Chauvel, Bruno
    Guillemin, Jean-Philippe
    Gasquez, Jacques
    Gauvrit, Christian
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 2012, 42 : 320 - 326
  • [6] Assessing non-chemical weeding strategies through mechanistic modelling of blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.) dynamics
    Colbach, N.
    Kurstjens, D. A. G.
    Munier-Jolain, N. M.
    Dalbies, A.
    Dore, T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2010, 32 (03) : 205 - 218
  • [7] Fogelberg F, 1999, WEED RES, V39, P469, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3180.1999.00163.x
  • [8] Guo X., 2016, AGR EQUIPMENT VEHICL, V2016, P47
  • [9] Kaierle S., 2013, Laser Technik Journal, V10, P44, DOI [10.1002/latj.201390038, DOI 10.1002/LATJ.201390038]
  • [10] Michaels A., 2015, 2015 IEEE RSJ INT C