Large-Scale Systematic Analysis of 2D Fingerprint Methods and Parameters to Improve Virtual Screening Enrichments

被引:276
作者
Sastry, Madhavi [2 ]
Lowrie, Jeffrey F. [1 ]
Dixon, Steven L. [1 ]
Sherman, Woody [1 ]
机构
[1] Schrodinger, New York, NY 10036 USA
[2] Schrodinger, Hyderabad 500034, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTORS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURES; COMPOUND SELECTION; SIMILARITY; SHAPE; DATABASES; DOCKING; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1021/ci100062n
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
A systematic virtual screening study on 11 pharmaceutically relevant targets has been conducted to investigate the interrelation between 8 two-dimensional (2D) fingerprinting methods, 13 atom-typing schemes, 13 bit scaling rules, and 12 similarity metrics using the new cheminformatics package Canvas. In total, 157 872 virtual screens were performed to assess the ability of each combination of parameters to identify actives in a database screen. In general, fingerprint methods, such as MOLPRINT2D, Radial, and Dendritic that encode information about local environment beyond simple linear paths outperformed other fingerprint methods. Atom-typing schemes with more specific information, such as Daylight, Mol2, and Carhart were generally superior to more generic atom-typing schemes. Enrichment factors across all targets were improved considerably with the best settings, although no single set of parameters performed optimally on all targets. The size of the addressable bit space or the fingerprints was also explored, and it was found to have a substantial impact on enrichments. Small bit spaces, such as 1024, resulted in many collisions and in a significant degradation in enrichments compared to larger bit spaces that avoid collisions.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 784
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [11] The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptors relevant to ligand-receptor binding
    Brown, RD
    Martin, YC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1997, 37 (01): : 1 - 9
  • [12] Use of structure Activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection
    Brown, RD
    Martin, YC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1996, 36 (03): : 572 - 584
  • [13] CARHART RE, 1985, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V25, P65
  • [14] *CHEMAXON, 2010, GENERATEMD VERS 5 3
  • [15] Performance of similarity measures in 2D fragment-based similarity searching: Comparison of structural descriptors and similarity coefficients
    Chen, X
    Reynolds, CH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2002, 42 (06): : 1407 - 1414
  • [16] PHARMACOPHORIC PATTERN-MATCHING IN PILES OF 3-DIMENSIONAL CHEMICAL STRUCTURES - COMPARISON OF CONFORMATIONAL-SEARCHING ALGORITHMS FOR FLEXIBLE SEARCHING
    CLARK, DE
    JONES, G
    WILLETT, P
    KENNY, PW
    GLEN, RC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1994, 34 (01): : 197 - 206
  • [17] Prospective identification of biologically active structures by topomer shape similarity searching
    Cramer, RD
    Poss, MA
    Hermsmeier, MA
    Caulfield, TJ
    Kowala, MC
    Valentine, MT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 42 (19) : 3919 - 3933
  • [18] *DAYL CHEM SYST IN, 2008, DAYL THEOR MAN
  • [19] *DAYL CHEM SYST IN, 2008, DAYL FING TOOLK VERS
  • [20] Daylight Chemical Information Systems, 2008, SMARTS LANG DESCR MO