Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review

被引:70
作者
McCarron, Tamara L. [1 ,2 ]
Clement, Fiona [1 ,2 ]
Rasiah, Jananee [3 ]
Moran, Chelsea [4 ]
Moffat, Karen [1 ,2 ]
Gonzalez, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Wasylak, Tracy [5 ,6 ]
Santana, Maria [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dept Community Hlth Sci, Teaching Res & Wellness Bldg,3280 Hosp Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[2] OBrien Inst Publ Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton Clin Hlth Acad ECHA 3 141, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Psychol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Alberta Hlth Serv, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Fac Nursing, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
co-production; patient and public involvement; patient engagement; scoping review; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT; DECISION-MAKING; COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH REFLECTIONS; CO-DESIGN; ENGAGEMENT; CARE; PEOPLE; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1111/hex.13272
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The role of patient involvement in health research has evolved over the past decade. Despite efforts to engage patients as partners, the role is not well understood. We undertook this review to understand the engagement practices of patients who assume roles as partners in health research. Methods Using a recognized methodological approach, two academic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) and grey literature sources were searched. Findings were organized into one of the three higher levels of engagement, described by the Patient and Researcher Engagement framework developed by Manafo. We examined and quantified the supportive strategies used during involvement, used thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke and themed the purpose of engagement, and categorized the reported outcomes according to the CIHR Engagement Framework. Results Out of 6621 records, 119 sources were included in the review. Thematic analysis of the purpose of engagement revealed five themes: documenting and advancing PPI, relevance of research, co-building, capacity building and impact on research. Improved research design was the most common reported outcome and the most common role for patient partners was as members of the research team, and the most commonly used strategy to support involvement was by meetings. Conclusion The evidence collected during this review advanced our understanding of the engagement of patients as research partners. As patient involvement becomes more mainstream, this knowledge will aid researchers and policy-makers in the development of approaches and tools to support engagement. Patient/User Involvement Patients led and conducted the grey literature search, including the synthesis and interpretation of the findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1378 / 1390
页数:13
相关论文
共 148 条
[91]   Understanding the motivations of patients: A co-designed project to understand the factors behind patient engagement [J].
McCarron, Tamara L. ;
Noseworthy, Thomas ;
Moffat, Karen ;
Wilkinson, Gloria ;
Zelinsky, Sandra ;
White, Deborah ;
Hassay, Derek ;
Lorenzetti, Diane L. ;
Marlett, Nancy J. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2019, 22 (04) :709-720
[92]   Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review [J].
McCarron, Tamara L. ;
Moffat, Karen ;
Wilkinson, Gloria ;
Zelinsky, Sandra ;
Boyd, Jamie M. ;
White, Deborah ;
Hassay, Derek ;
Lorenzetti, Diane L. ;
Marlett, Nancy J. ;
Noseworthy, Thomas .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
[93]  
McKinney, 2016, LIVING INFLAMMATORY
[94]   A SHARED study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges [J].
Mockford C. ;
Murray M. ;
Seers K. ;
Oyebode J. ;
Grant R. ;
Boex S. ;
Staniszewska S. ;
Diment Y. ;
Leach J. ;
Sharma U. ;
Clarke R. ;
Suleman R. .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 2 (1)
[95]   Negotiating the coresearcher mandate - service users' experiences of doing collaborative research on mental health [J].
Moltu, Christian ;
Stefansen, Jon ;
Svisdahl, Marit ;
Veseth, Marius .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 34 (19) :1608-1616
[96]  
Morris C., CONSUMERS TAKE INITI
[97]  
Nguyen, 2016, ERAS PATIENT PERSPEC
[98]   Developing voice and empowerment: the first step towards a broad consultation in research agenda setting [J].
Nierse, C. J. ;
Abma, T. A. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2011, 55 :411-421
[99]   Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team [J].
Nierse, Christi J. ;
Schipper, Karen ;
van Zadelhoff, Ezra ;
van de Griendt, Joos ;
Abma, Tineke A. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2012, 15 (03) :242-254
[100]   Patient Governance in a Patient-Powered Research Network for Adult Rheumatologic Conditions [J].
Nowell, W. Benjamin ;
Curtis, Jeffrey R. ;
Crow-Hercher, Rachelle .
MEDICAL CARE, 2018, 56 (10) :S16-S21