Patient experience of telemedicine for headache care during the COVID-19 pandemic: An American Migraine Foundation survey study

被引:29
作者
Chiang, Chia-Chun [1 ]
Singh, Rashmi Halker [2 ]
Lalvani, Nim [3 ]
Stein, Ken Shubin [4 ]
Lorenz, Deborah Henscheid [5 ]
Lay, Christine [6 ]
Dodick, David W. [2 ]
Newman, Lawrence C. [7 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Amer Migraine Fdn, Mt Royal, NJ USA
[4] Northwell Hlth, Dept Neurol, Zucker Sch Med, Hempstead, NY USA
[5] Lorenz & Kopf LLC, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Neurol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] NYU, Dept Neurol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2021年 / 61卷 / 05期
关键词
coronavirus disease 2019; migraine; patient perspective; patient satisfaction; telehealth; telemedicine;
D O I
10.1111/head.14110
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective We sought to investigate the patient experience of telemedicine for headache care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Background The use of telemedicine has rapidly expanded and evolved since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine eliminates the physical and geographic barriers to health care, preserves personal protective equipment, and prevents the spread of COVID-19 by allowing encounters to happen in a socially distanced way. However, few studies have assessed the patient perspective of telemedicine for headache care. Methods The American Migraine Foundation (AMF) designed a standardized electronic questionnaire to assess the patient experience of telemedicine for headache care between March and September 2020 to help inform future quality improvement as part of its patient advocacy initiative. The date parameters were identified as the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 disease and the declaration of a national emergency in the United States. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to more than 100,000 members of the AMF community through social media platforms and the AMF email database. Results A total of 1172 patients responded to our electronic questionnaire, with 1098 complete responses. The majority, 1081/1153 (93.8%) patients, had a previous headache diagnosis prior to the telemedicine encounter. A total of 648/1127 (57.5%) patients reported that they had used telemedicine for headache care during the study period. Among those who participated in telehealth visits, 553/647 (85.5%) patients used it for follow-up visits; 94/647 (14.5%) patients used it for new patient visits. During the telemedicine encounters, 282/645 (43.7%) patients were evaluated by headache specialists, 222/645 (34.4%) patients by general neurologists, 198/645 (30.7%) patients by primary care providers, 73/645 (11.3%) patients by headache nurse practitioners, and 21/645 (3.2%) patients by headache nurses. Only 47/633 (7.4%) patients received a new headache diagnosis from telemedicine evaluation, whereas the other 586/633 (92.6%) patients did not have a change in their diagnoses. During these visits, a new treatment was prescribed for 358/636 (52.3%) patients, whereas 278/636 (43.7%) patients did not have changes made to their treatment plan. The number (%) of patients who rated the telemedicine headache care experience as "very good," "good," "fair," "poor," and "other" were 396/638 (62.1%), 132/638 (20.7%), 67/638 (10.5%), 23/638 (3.6%), and 20/638 (3.1%), respectively. Detailed reasons for "other" are listed in the manuscript. Most patients, 573/638 (89.8%), indicated that they would prefer to continue to use telemedicine for their headache care, 45/638 (7.1%) patients would not, and 20/638 (3.1%) patients were unsure. Conclusions Our study evaluating the patient perspective demonstrated that telemedicine facilitated headache care for many patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in high patient satisfaction rates, and a desire to continue to use telemedicine for future headache care among those who completed the online survey.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 739
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Feigin VL., 2021, JAMA NEUROL, V78, P1990
[2]   A randomized trial of telemedicine for migraine management [J].
Friedman, Deborah, I ;
Rajan, Balaraman ;
Seidmann, Abraham .
CEPHALALGIA, 2019, 39 (12) :1577-1585
[3]   Telemedicine in neurology Telemedicine Work Group of the American Academy of Neurology update [J].
Hatcher-Martin, Jaime M. ;
Adams, Jamie Lynn ;
Anderson, Eric R. ;
Bove, Riley ;
Burrus, Tamika M. ;
Chehrenama, Mahan ;
O'Brien, Mary Dolan ;
Eliashiv, Dawn S. ;
Erten-Lyons, Deniz ;
Giesser, Barbara S. ;
Moo, Lauren R. ;
Narayanaswami, Pushpa ;
Rossi, Marvin A. ;
Soni, Madhu ;
Tariq, Nauman ;
Tsao, Jack W. ;
Vargas, Bert B. ;
Vota, Scott A. ;
Wessels, Scott R. ;
Planalp, Hannah ;
Govindarajan, Raghav .
NEUROLOGY, 2020, 94 (01) :30-38
[4]   Headache patients' satisfaction with telemedicine: a 12-month follow-up randomized non-inferiority trial [J].
Muller, K. I. ;
Alstadhaug, K. B. ;
Bekkelund, S. I. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2017, 24 (06) :807-815
[5]   A randomized trial of telemedicine efficacy and safety for nonacute headaches [J].
Muller, Kai I. ;
Alstadhaug, Karl B. ;
Bekkelund, Svein I. .
NEUROLOGY, 2017, 89 (02) :153-162
[6]   Migraine remains second among the world's causes of disability, and first among young women: findings from GBD2019 [J].
Steiner, T. J. ;
Stovner, L. J. ;
Jensen, R. ;
Uluduz, D. ;
Katsarava, Z. .
JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2020, 21 (01)
[7]   Migraine Care in the Era of COVID-19: Clinical Pearls and Plea to Insurers [J].
Szperka, Christina L. ;
Ailani, Jessica ;
Barmherzig, Rebecca ;
Klein, Brad C. ;
Minen, Mia T. ;
Singh, Rashmi B. Halker ;
Shapiro, Robert E. .
HEADACHE, 2020, 60 (05) :833-842