Comparative Assessment of Civil Infrastructure Network Performance under Probabilistic and Scenario Earthquakes

被引:29
作者
Adachi, Takao [2 ]
Ellingwood, Bruce R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Coll Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Obayashi Res Corp, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Civil infrastructure; Earthquakes; Electrical power transmission; Fragility; Lifeline systems; Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis system reliability;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2010)16:1(1)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The intensity of the seismic demand in a vulnerability assessment of an engineered system can be described in terms of either its annual probability of being exceeded or a scenario earthquake. A probabilistically stated hazard (e.g., one with a return period of 2,475 years) represents an aggregation of numerous earthquakes and may not represent the spatial distribution of seismic intensity from a severe earthquake over a region correctly, making its application to performance evaluation of a large-scale distributed civil infrastructure system questionable. A scenario earthquake models the spatial intensity correctly, but conveys no quantitative measure of the seismic risk. This paper examines the use of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and corresponding scenario earthquakes as a basis for vulnerability assessment of a networked system. Following an examination of simple spatially distributed series and parallel system models, a vulnerability assessment of an electrical power network in a region of moderate seismicity in the Central United States offers additional insight into the issue.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Adachi T., 2007, THESIS GEORGIA I TEC
[2]   Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: Effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability [J].
Adachi, Takao ;
Ellingwood, Bruce R. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (01) :78-88
[3]   A model for the seismic reliability assessment of electric power transmission systems [J].
Ang, AHS ;
Pires, JA ;
Villaverde, R .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1996, 51 (01) :7-22
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, HAZUS MH MR1 TECHN M
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ASCE/SEI 7-05 including Supplement No.1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Fema 450: The 2003 Nehrp Recommended Provisions for New Building and Other Structures
[7]  
Chang SE, 2000, Earthq. Spec., V16, P557, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.1586127
[8]   SEISMIC HAZARD INPUT FOR LIFELINE SYSTEMS [J].
EGUCHI, RT .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1991, 10 (1-3) :193-198
[9]   ALGORITHM-97 - SHORTEST PATH [J].
FLOYD, RW .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1962, 5 (06) :345-345
[10]  
Hwang, 1998, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V4, P118, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1998)4:3(118)