Concurrent Blade Aerodynamic-Aero-elastic Design Optimization Using Adjoint Method

被引:40
作者
He, L. [1 ]
Wang, D. X. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Engn Sci, Osney Lab, Oxford OX1 3PJ, England
[2] Siemens Ind Turbomachinery Ltd, Lincoln LN5 7FD, England
来源
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2011年 / 133卷 / 01期
关键词
UNSTEADY; CASCADES; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1115/1.4000544
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Increasing aerothermal and aero-elastic performance requirements and constraints are closely linked in modern blading designs. There is thus a need for more concurrent interaction between the disciplines at earlier stages of a design process. Presented in this paper are the development, validation, and demonstration of the adjoint approach to concurrent blading aerodynamic and aero-elastic design optimizations. A nonlinear harmonic phase solution method is adopted to solve the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations. The flow field response in terms of both the mean aerothermal performance and aero-elastic stability to a geometrical perturbation can be obtained by three "steadylike" flow solutions at three distinctive temporal phases. This unsteady flow solution method is computationally very efficient and provides a convenient and consistent base for formulating the corresponding adjoint equations. The adjoint system for the unsteady flow solver is solved effectively by a relatively simple extension of the method and techniques previously developed for a steady flow adjoint solver. As a result, the sensitivities of both the steady (time-mean) flow loss and the aerodynamic damping/forcing to detailed blade geometry changes can be very efficiently obtained by solving equivalently three steadylike adjoint equations. Several case studies are presented to illustrate the validity and effectiveness of this new concurrent approach. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4000544]
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A comparison of approximate versus exact geometrical representations of roughness for CFD calculations of cf and St [J].
Bons, J. P. ;
McClain, S. T. ;
Wang, Z. J. ;
Chi, X. ;
Shih, T. I. .
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2008, 130 (02)
[2]   REDESIGN AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A TRANSONIC AXIAL COMPRESSOR STATOR AND EQUIVALENT PLANE CASCADES WITH SUBSONIC CONTROLLED DIFFUSION BLADES [J].
DUNKER, R ;
RECHTER, H ;
STARKEN, H ;
WEYER, H .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1984, 106 (02) :279-287
[3]   The harmonic adjoint approach to unsteady turbomachinery design [J].
Duta, MC ;
Giles, MB ;
Campobasso, MS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2002, 40 (3-4) :323-332
[4]   An introduction to the adjoint approach to design [J].
Giles, MB ;
Pierce, NA .
FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 2000, 65 (3-4) :393-415
[5]   Computation of unsteady nonlinear flows in cascades using a harmonic balance technique [J].
Hall, KC ;
Thomas, JP ;
Clark, WS .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2002, 40 (05) :879-886
[6]   Harmonic solution of unsteady flow around blades with separation [J].
He, L. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2008, 46 (06) :1299-1307
[7]   Efficient approach for analysis of unsteady viscous flows in turbomachines [J].
He, L ;
Ning, W .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1998, 36 (11) :2005-2012
[8]  
He L., 2003, HDB TURBOMACHINERY
[9]  
Jameson A., 1988, Journal of Scientific Computing, V3, P233, DOI 10.1007/BF01061285
[10]  
MOFFAT S, 2003, GT200338640 ASME