External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity

被引:72
作者
Barsties, Ben [1 ,2 ]
Maryn, Youri [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Hsch Fresenius Univ Appl Sci, Sch Med, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Sint Augustinus Hosp, European Inst ORL, Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Univ Coll Ghent, Fac Educ Hlth & Social Work, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
voice; acoustic analysis; voice disorders; larynx; laryngology; otolaryngology; DYSPHONIA SEVERITY INDEX; CEPSTRAL SPECTRAL INDEX; PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION; OUTCOMES; RELIABILITY; DSI;
D O I
10.1177/0003489416636131
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is an objective method to quantify the severity of overall voice quality in concatenated continuous speech and sustained phonation segments. Recently, AVQI was successfully modified to be more representative and ecologically valid because the internal consistency of AVQI was balanced out through equal proportion of the 2 speech types. The present investigation aims to explore its external validation in a large data set. Methods: An expert panel of 12 speech-language therapists rated the voice quality of 1058 concatenated voice samples varying from normophonia to severe dysphonia. The Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients (r) were used to measure concurrent validity. The AVQI's diagnostic accuracy was evaluated with several estimates of its receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Results: Finally, 8 of the 12 experts were chosen because of reliability criteria. A strong correlation was identified between AVQI and auditoryperceptual rating (r = 0.815, P = .000). It indicated that 66.4% of the auditory-perceptual rating's variation was explained by AVQI. Additionally, the ROC results showed again the best diagnostic outcome at a threshold of AVQI = 2.43. Conclusions: This study highlights external validation and diagnostic precision of the AVQI version 03.01 as a robust and ecologically valid measurement to objectify voice quality.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 583
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] [Belgian Advisory Committee on Bioethics Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products], 2007, GUID NON STUD
  • [12] Boersma P., 2018, Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3) Computer software
  • [13] The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation
    Chan, KMK
    Yiu, EML
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2002, 45 (01): : 111 - 126
  • [14] Dejonckere P.H., 1995, Journal of Voice, V4, P96
  • [15] Adverse effects of environmental noise on acoustic voice quality measurements
    Deliyski, DD
    Shaw, HS
    Evans, MK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2005, 19 (01) : 15 - 28
  • [16] Regression tree approach to studying factors influencing acoustic voice analysis
    Deliyski, Dimitar D.
    Shaw, Heather S.
    Evans, Maegan K.
    [J]. FOLIA PHONIATRICA ET LOGOPAEDICA, 2006, 58 (04) : 274 - 288
  • [17] Dollaghan C.A., 2007, HDB EVIDENCE BASED P
  • [18] FLEISS JL, 1971, PSYCHOL BULL, V76, P378, DOI 10.1037/h0031619
  • [19] Frey L.R., 2000, INVESTIGATING COMMUN, V2nd
  • [20] Correlation Among the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), the RBH Voice Perceptual Evaluation, and Minimum Glottal Area in Female Patients With Vocal Fold Nodules
    Gaber, Ammar Gaber Hussein
    Liang, Fa-Ya
    Yang, Jin-Shan
    Wang, Ya-Jing
    Zheng, Yi-Qing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2014, 28 (01) : 20 - 23