External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity

被引:72
作者
Barsties, Ben [1 ,2 ]
Maryn, Youri [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Hsch Fresenius Univ Appl Sci, Sch Med, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Sint Augustinus Hosp, European Inst ORL, Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Univ Coll Ghent, Fac Educ Hlth & Social Work, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
voice; acoustic analysis; voice disorders; larynx; laryngology; otolaryngology; DYSPHONIA SEVERITY INDEX; CEPSTRAL SPECTRAL INDEX; PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION; OUTCOMES; RELIABILITY; DSI;
D O I
10.1177/0003489416636131
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is an objective method to quantify the severity of overall voice quality in concatenated continuous speech and sustained phonation segments. Recently, AVQI was successfully modified to be more representative and ecologically valid because the internal consistency of AVQI was balanced out through equal proportion of the 2 speech types. The present investigation aims to explore its external validation in a large data set. Methods: An expert panel of 12 speech-language therapists rated the voice quality of 1058 concatenated voice samples varying from normophonia to severe dysphonia. The Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients (r) were used to measure concurrent validity. The AVQI's diagnostic accuracy was evaluated with several estimates of its receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Results: Finally, 8 of the 12 experts were chosen because of reliability criteria. A strong correlation was identified between AVQI and auditoryperceptual rating (r = 0.815, P = .000). It indicated that 66.4% of the auditory-perceptual rating's variation was explained by AVQI. Additionally, the ROC results showed again the best diagnostic outcome at a threshold of AVQI = 2.43. Conclusions: This study highlights external validation and diagnostic precision of the AVQI version 03.01 as a robust and ecologically valid measurement to objectify voice quality.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 583
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] The relationship between subjective self-rating and objective voice assessment measures
    Aboras, Yehia
    El-Banna, Manal
    El-Magraby, Riham
    Ibrahim, Amira
    [J]. LOGOPEDICS PHONIATRICS VOCOLOGY, 2010, 35 (01) : 34 - 38
  • [2] PERCEPTION OF HOARSENESS BY SEVERAL CLASSES OF LISTENERS
    ANDERS, LC
    HOLLIEN, H
    HURME, P
    SONNINEN, A
    WENDLER, J
    [J]. FOLIA PHONIATRICA, 1988, 40 (02): : 91 - 100
  • [3] [Anonymous], JAIISH
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, The Cambridge Dictionary of statistics
  • [5] Spectral-Cepstral Estimation of Dysphonia Severity: External Validation
    Awan, Shaheen N.
    Solomon, Nancy Pearl
    Helou, Leah B.
    Stojadinovic, Alexander
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 122 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [6] Quantifying dysphonia severity using a spectral/cepstral-based acoustic index: Comparisons with auditory-perceptual judgements from the CAPE-V
    Awan, Shaheen N.
    Roy, Nelson
    Jette, Marie E.
    Meltzner, Geoffrey S.
    Hillman, Robert E.
    [J]. CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2010, 24 (09) : 742 - 758
  • [7] The Acoustic Voice Quality Index. Toward expanded measurement of dysphonia severity in German subjects
    Barsties, B.
    Maryn, Y.
    [J]. HNO, 2012, 60 (08) : 715 - 720
  • [8] Barsties B, LOGOPED PHONIATR VOC
  • [9] The improvement of internal consistency of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index
    Barsties, Ben
    Maryn, Youri
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 36 (05) : 647 - 656
  • [10] Assessment of voice quality: Current state-of-the-art
    Barsties, Ben
    De Bodt, Marc
    [J]. AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2015, 42 (03) : 183 - 188