Relative leaching and aquatic toxicity of pressure-treated wood products using batch leaching tests

被引:52
作者
Stook, K
Tolaymat, T
Ward, M
Dubey, B
Townsend, T [1 ]
Solo-Gabriele, H
Bitton, G
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Environm Engn Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es0493603
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Size-reduced samples of southern yellow pine dimensional lumber, each treated with one of five different waterborne chemical preservatives, were leached using 18-h batch leaching tests. The wood preservatives included chromated copper arsenate (CCA), alkaline copper quaternary, copper boron azole, copper citrate, and copper dimethyldithiocarbamate. An unpreserved wood sample was tested as well. The batch leaching tests followed methodology prescribed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). The wood samples were first size-reduced and then leached using four different leaching solutions (synthetic landfill leachate, synthetic rainwater, deionized water, and synthetic seawater). CCA-treated wood leached greater concentrations of arsenic and copper relative to chromium, with copper leaching more with the TCLP and synthetic seawater. Copper leached at greater concentrations from the arsenic-free preservatives relative to CCA. Arsenic leached from CCA-treated wood at concentrations above the U.S. federal toxicity characteristic limit (5 mg/L). All of the arsenic-free alternatives displayed a greater degree of aquatic toxicity compared to CCA. Invertebrate and algal assays were more sensitive than Microtox. Examination of the relative leaching of the preservative compounds indicated that the arsenic-free preservatives were advantageous over CCA with respect to waste disposal and soil contamination issues but potentially posed a greater risk to aquatic ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 163
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
American Wood-Preservers' Association (AWPA), 1999, AM WOOD PRES ASS BOO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, 3052 US EPA
[3]   Release of copper, chromium and arsenic from CCA-C treated lumber in estuaries [J].
Breslin, VT ;
Adler-Ivanbrook, L .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 1998, 46 (01) :111-125
[4]  
COOPER PA, 1991, FOREST PROD J, V41, P30
[5]  
Decker P, 2002, AIHAJ, V63, P166, DOI 10.1080/15428110208984700
[6]  
*DIONEX, 2002, 123 DIONEX
[7]   SPECIATION OF DISSOLVED COPPER AND NICKEL IN SOUTH SAN-FRANCISCO BAY - A MULTIMETHOD APPROACH [J].
DONAT, JR ;
LAO, KA ;
BRULAND, KW .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1994, 284 (03) :547-571
[8]  
Ferrari B, 1999, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V18, P1195, DOI [10.1002/etc.5620180618, 10.1897/1551-5028(1999)018&lt
[9]  
1195:EAOSWA&gt
[10]  
2.3.CO