Local Residents' Social-Ecological Adaptability of the Qilian Mountain National Park Pilot, Northwestern China

被引:6
作者
Li, Jing [1 ]
Ma, Guoqiang [1 ]
Feng, Jinghua [1 ]
Guo, Liying [1 ]
Huang, Yinzhou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Earth & Environm Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Key Lab Western Chinas Environm Syst, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
关键词
adaptability; residents; perception; Qilian Mountain National Park Pilot; social-ecological sysm; SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS FRAMEWORK; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; ADAPTATION; VULNERABILITY; CONSERVATION; PERCEPTIONS; IMPACTS; FARMERS;
D O I
10.3390/land11050742
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Protected areas are critical for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services. In the last few years, there has been growing recognition of the role of indigenous peoples and local communities in the management of government designated protected areas, and thus their perceptions and adaptability were paid much attention. Drawing on a survey of 487 residents in the Qilian Mountain National Park Pilot of Northwestern China, this study used the adaptive analysis framework to study the adaptability of local residents. The main contribution of this paper is to select a typical social-ecological system to study the adaptability of local residents, and using Elinor Ostrom's Social-Ecological System framework to analyze the adaptability mechanism. The results show that different types of residents had different adaptability to environmental change. People whose income mainly depends on work salary with a small part of herding have the highest level of adaptability, while people whose income mostly comes from farming with a small part of herding have the lowest level. This result is related to people's living location, as people living in the core zone and buffer zone of the reserve mainly earned from grazing, and people living in the experimental zone and peripheral zone earned mainly from outside work. Moreover, people living in the core zone and buffer zone are mostly elders and ethnic groups, while people in the experimental zone and buffer zone are Han people. To improve management effectiveness and to avoid conflict between local residents and managers, this paper suggests that more attention should be paid to these who have lived for a long time in the core zone and buffer zone. They are the most vulnerable groups and show low adaptability in almost all domains. For the long run, education quality should be improved to decrease the population in the reserve.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Using the sustainable livelihoods framework to identify constraints and opportunities to the development of freshwater prawn farming in southwest Bangladesh [J].
Ahmed, Nesar ;
Allison, Edward H. ;
Muir, James F. .
JOURNAL OF THE WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY, 2008, 39 (05) :598-611
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, CLIM DEV, DOI DOI 10.1080/17565529.2018.1442808
[3]   Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation [J].
Bennett, Nathan J. ;
Roth, Robin ;
Klain, Sarah C. ;
Chan, Kai ;
Christie, Patrick ;
Clark, Douglas A. ;
Cullman, Georgina ;
Curran, Deborah ;
Durbin, Trevor J. ;
Epstein, Graham ;
Greenberg, Alison ;
Nelson, Michael P. ;
Sandlos, John ;
Stedman, Richard ;
Teel, Tara L. ;
Thomas, Rebecca ;
Verissimo, Diogo ;
Wyborn, Carina .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 205 :93-108
[4]   Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand [J].
Bennett, Nathan James ;
Dearden, Philip .
MARINE POLICY, 2014, 44 :107-116
[5]   Sixty years of tracking conservation progress using the World Database on Protected Areas [J].
Bingham, Heather C. ;
Bignoli, Diego Juffe ;
Lewis, Edward ;
MacSharry, Brian ;
Burgess, Neil D. ;
Visconti, Piero ;
Deguignet, Marine ;
Misrachi, Murielle ;
Walpole, Matt ;
Stewart, Jessica L. ;
Brooks, Thomas M. ;
Kingston, Naomi .
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2019, 3 (05) :737-743
[6]   Public understanding of protected area designation [J].
Booth, Josephine E. ;
Gaston, Kevin J. ;
Armsworth, Paul R. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (12) :3196-3200
[7]   Climate change adaptation: factors influencing Chinese smallholder farmers' perceived self-efficacy and adaptation intent [J].
Burnham, Morey ;
Ma, Zhao .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2017, 17 (01) :171-186
[8]   Does community resilience decrease social-ecological vulnerability? Adaptation pathways trade-off in the Bolivian Altiplano [J].
Chelleri, Lorenzo ;
Minucci, Guido ;
Skrimizea, Eirini .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2016, 16 (08) :2229-2241
[9]   Adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems: a framework for addressing bark beetle disturbances in natural resource management [J].
Cottrell, Stuart ;
Mattor, Katherine M. ;
Morris, Jesse L. ;
Fettig, Christopher J. ;
McGrady, Pavlina ;
Maguire, Dorothy ;
James, Patrick M. A. ;
Clear, Jennifer ;
Wurtzebach, Zach ;
Wei, Yu ;
Brunelle, Andrea ;
Western, Jessica ;
Maxwell, Reed ;
Rotar, Marissa ;
Gallagher, Lisa ;
Roberts, Ryan .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (02) :555-567
[10]  
Cumming GS, 2014, GLOB ENVIRON STUD, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-54910-9_1