Hybrid PET-CT simulation for radiation treatment planning in head-and-neck cancers: A brief technical report

被引:108
作者
Heron, DE
Andrade, RS
Flickinger, J
Johnson, J
Agarwala, SS
Wu, A
Kalnicki, S
Avril, N
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Div Med Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Dept Radiol, Div Nucl Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2004年 / 60卷 / 05期
关键词
hybrid PET-CT; FDG; head-and-neck cancer; radiation simulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.037
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prospectively study the impact on tumor and normal tissue delineation for RT planning by use of hybrid PET-CT simulation for patients with head-and-neck cancer. Methods and Materials: Twenty-one patients were simulated in treatment position on a hybrid PET-CT scanner. Images were transferred to the Varian Eclipse planning system. Abnormal areas of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake were contoured on PET for the gross tumor volume of primaries (GTVp) and abnormal nodal region of primaries (ABNp) then compared with the same CT gross tumor volumes (GTVc) and abnormal nodal region (ABNc). A statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation of PET and CT volumes. Results: Positron emission tomography demonstrated the primary in all cases, whereas CT did not find the primary in 3 cases. In 8 patients, additional areas of disease were seen only in PET. The average ratio of GTVc/GTVp was 3.1 (range, 0.3-23.6), whereas for ABNc/ABNp was 0.7 (range, 0-4). Volumes for the primaries were significantly larger on CT than on PET (p = 0.002) but not for nodal regions (p = 0.5). Conclusions: Hybrid PET-CT simulation is feasible and provides valuable information that results in greater delineation of normal tissues from tumor bearing areas at high risk for recurrence. This finding may further improve therapeutic window for IMRT for head-and-neck cancers (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1424
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer
    Adams, S
    Baum, RP
    Stuckensen, T
    Bitter, K
    Hör, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1998, 25 (09) : 1255 - 1260
  • [2] *AM JOINT COMM CAN, 2002, AJCR CANC STAG MAN
  • [3] Diagnosis and staging of head and neck cancer - A comparison of modern imaging modalities (positron emission tomography, computed tomography, color-coded duplex sonography) with panendoscopic and histopathologic findings
    Di Martino, E
    Nowak, B
    Hassan, HA
    Hausmann, R
    Adam, G
    Buell, U
    Westhofen, M
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2000, 126 (12) : 1457 - 1461
  • [4] FABER LA, 1999, LARYNGOSCOPE, V109, P970
  • [5] Assessment of clinical utility Of 18F-FDG PET in patients with head and neck cancer:: a probability analysis
    Goerres, GW
    Mosna-Firlejczyk, K
    Steurer, J
    von Schulthess, GK
    Bachmann, LM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (04) : 562 - 571
  • [6] Uses and limitations of FDG positron emission tomography in patients with head and neck cancer
    Hanasono, MM
    Kunda, LD
    Segall, GM
    Ku, GH
    Terris, DJ
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 1999, 109 (06) : 880 - 885
  • [7] Evaluation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography with histopathologic correlation in the initial staging of head and neck cancer
    Hannah, A
    Scott, AM
    Tochon-Danguy, H
    Chan, JG
    Akhurst, T
    Berlangieri, S
    Price, D
    Smith, GJ
    Schelleman, T
    McKay, WJ
    Sizeland, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (02) : 208 - 217
  • [8] Kluetz P G., 2000, Clin Positron Imaging, V3, P223, DOI 10.1016/S1095-0397(01)00055-3
  • [9] Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients
    Kostakoglu, L
    Agress, H
    Goldsmith, SJ
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2003, 23 (02) : 315 - 340
  • [10] Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET:: a comparison with conventional methods
    Kresnik, E
    Mikosch, P
    Gallowitsch, HJ
    Kogler, D
    Wieser, S
    Heinisch, M
    Unterweger, O
    Raunik, W
    Kumnig, G
    Gomez, I
    Grünbacher, G
    Lind, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (07) : 816 - 821