Evaluating drug prices, availability, affordability, and price components: Implications for access to drugs in Malaysia

被引:114
作者
Babar, Zaheer Ud Din [1 ]
Ibrahim, Mohamed Izham Mohamed
Singh, Harpal
Bukahri, Nadeem Irfan
Creese, Andrew
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Discipline Social & Administrat Pharm, George Town, Malaysia
[2] Univ Coll Sedaya Int, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[3] Int Med Univ, Sch Pharm, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[4] La Grille, Les Ventes Bourse, France
来源
PLOS MEDICINE | 2007年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pmed.0040082
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Malaysia's stable health care system is facing challenges with increasing medicine costs. To investigate these issues a survey was carried out to evaluate medicine prices, availability, affordability, and the structure of price components. Methods and Findings The methodology developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Health Action International (HAI) was used. Price and availability data for 48 medicines was collected from 20 public sector facilities, 32 private sector retail pharmacies and 20 dispensing doctors in four geographical regions of West Malaysia. Medicine prices were compared with international reference prices (IRPs) to obtain a median price ratio. The daily wage of the lowest paid unskilled government worker was used to gauge the affordability of medicines. Price component data were collected throughout the supply chain, and markups, taxes, and other distribution costs were identified. In private pharmacies, innovator brand (IB) prices were 16 times higher than the IRPs, while generics were 6.6 times higher. In dispensing doctor clinics, the figures were 15 times higher for innovator brands and 7.5 for generics. Dispensing doctors applied high markups of 50%-76% for IBs, and up to 316% for generics. Retail pharmacy markups were also high-25%-38% and 100%-140% for IBs and generics, respectively. In the public sector, where medicines are free, availability was low even for medicines on the National Essential Drugs List. For a month's treatment for peptic ulcer disease and hypertension people have to pay about a week's wages in the private sector. Conclusions The free market by definition does not control medicine prices, necessitating price monitoring and control mechanisms. Markups for generic products are greater than for IBs. Reducing the base price without controlling markups may increase profits for retailers and dispensing doctors without reducing the price paid by end users. To increase access and affordability, promotion of generic medicines and improved availability of medicines in the public sector are required.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 475
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] *AUSTR GOV PROD CO, 2001, INT PHARM RRIC DIFF
  • [2] Azmi IM, 2001, J WORLD INTELLECTUAL, V4, P947, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1747-1796.2001.tb00144.x
  • [3] Babar Z-U-D., 2003, ESSENTIAL DRUGS MONI, V33, P18
  • [4] Babar ZU, 2005, J GENERIC MED, V3, P47
  • [5] BABAR ZU, 2004, J PHARM FINANCE EC P, V13, P3
  • [6] BABAR ZUD, 2005, J PHARM FINANC ECON, V14, P3
  • [7] Lessons from international experience in controlling pharmaceutical expenditure .3. Regulating industry
    Bloor, K
    Maynard, A
    Freemantle, N
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7048) : 33 - 35
  • [8] *CONS ASS PEN, 1994, MEM DRUG PRIC MAL NE
  • [9] *CONS ASS PEN, 2004, HIGH COST MED CAR MO, P184
  • [10] CRUEZ AF, 2004, INCOME DECIDE AMOUNT