Are Birds Smarter Than Mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) Perform Optimally on a Version of the Monty Hall Dilemma

被引:35
作者
Herbranson, Walter T. [1 ]
Schroeder, Julia [1 ]
机构
[1] Whitman Coll, Dept Psychol, Walla Walla, WA 99362 USA
关键词
pigeon; probability; matching; Monty Hall Dilemma; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CATEGORIZATION;
D O I
10.1037/a0017703
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The "Monty Hall Dilemma" (MHD) is a well known probability puzzle in which a player tries to guess which of three doors conceals a desirable prize. After an initial choice is made, one of the remaining doors is opened, revealing no prize. The player is then given the option of staying with their initial guess or switching to the other unopened door. Most people opt to stay with their initial guess, despite the fact that switching doubles the probability of winning. A series of experiments investigated whether pigeons (Columba livia), like most humans, would fail to maximize their expected winnings in a version of the MHD. Birds completed multiple trials of a standard MHD, with the three response keys in an operant chamber serving as the three doors and access to mixed grain as the prize. Across experiments, the probability of gaining reinforcement for switching and staying was manipulated, and birds adjusted their probability of switching and staying to approximate the optimal strategy. Replication of the procedure with human participants showed that humans failed to adopt optimal strategies, even with extensive training.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MAN WHO LOVED ONLY N
[2]   The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals? [J].
Arkes, HR ;
Ayton, P .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (05) :591-600
[3]   COMPLEX DECISION RULES IN CATEGORIZATION - CONTRASTING NOVICE AND EXPERIENCED PERFORMANCE [J].
ASHBY, FG ;
MADDOX, WT .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (01) :50-71
[4]   AUTO-SHAPING OF PIGEONS KEY-PECK [J].
BROWN, PL ;
JENKINS, HM .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1968, 11 (01) :1-&
[5]   PROBABILITY-MATCHING IN PIGEON [J].
BULLOCK, DH ;
BITTERMAN, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1962, 75 (04) :634-&
[6]   The collider principle in causal reasoning: Why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard [J].
Burns, BD ;
Wieth, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2004, 133 (03) :434-449
[7]  
DeNeys W., 2006, PSYCHOL DECISION MAK
[8]  
ESTES WK, 1961, BEHAV SCI, V6, P177
[9]   Probability matching: Encouraging optimal responding in humans [J].
Fantino, E ;
Esfandiari, A .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2002, 56 (01) :58-63
[10]   Reasoning in the Monty Hall problem: Examining choice behaviour and probability judgements [J].
Franco-Watkins, AM ;
Derks, PL ;
Dougherty, MRP .
THINKING & REASONING, 2003, 9 (01) :67-90