Construction and qualitative assessment of a bibliographic portfolio using the methodology Methodi Ordinatio

被引:28
作者
Regiani de Campos, Elaine Aparecida [1 ]
Pagani, Regina Negri [2 ]
Resende, Luis Mauricio [2 ]
Pontes, Joseane [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Rio Grande Sul UFRGS, Av Osvaldo Aranha 99, BR-90035141 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Technol Parana UTFPR, Dept Ind Engn, Campus Ponta Grossa Av Monteiro Lobato S-N,Km 04, BR-84016210 Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil
关键词
Bibliographic portfolio; Systematic literature review; Methodi Ordinatio; Trust; Horizontal Business Networks; SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS; LITERATURE-REVIEWS; IMPACT; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-018-2798-3
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Methodi Ordinatio is a methodology used to accomplish systematic literature reviews, to build bibliographical portfolios, and to map the state of the art of a research theme. It is composed of nine phases. The 7th phase, named InOrdinatio, applies an equation that orders the papers according to its scientific relevance. The equation applies the alpha (alpha) element, which can vary from 0 to 10 depending on the research need of currentness and according to the researcher's perception for its variation. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to test and analyse the variations of the alpha (alpha) values in the equation InOrdinatio and its influence in the qualification of the items that composes a portfolio. In order to reach this purpose, a practical application was performed and a bibliographic portfolio on the theme Horizontal Business Networks and Trust was built. Using the data from the bibliographic portfolio, the alpha values from 0 to 10 were applied and their influence on the final qualification of the articles was analysed. As a complementary objective, the areas where the methodology was successfully applied until now are also identified. The results show that the methodology is coherent, reproducible and useful to sort the most relevant articles in accordance with what is internationally recognized as valid scientific criteria: the impact factor, year of publication, and number of citations.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 842
页数:28
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STUDIES HIGHER ED
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, INTRO SYSTEMATIC REV
[3]  
[Anonymous], REV HCPA
[4]  
[Anonymous], CIENCIA INFORM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 6 INT WORKSH ADV CLE
[6]  
[Anonymous], REV ESPACIOS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH
[8]  
[Anonymous], REV ENSINO ENGENHARI
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1991, SURVEY RES
[10]  
[Anonymous], REV EMPREENDER E INO