St Gallen molecular subtypes in screening-detected and symptomatic breast cancer in a prospective cohort with long-term follow-up

被引:29
作者
Falck, A. K. [1 ,5 ]
Rome, A. [3 ,7 ]
Ferno, M. [2 ]
Olsson, H. [8 ]
Chebil, G. [6 ]
Bendahl, P. O. [2 ]
Ryden, L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Clin Sci Lund, Dept Surg, Lund, Sweden
[2] Clin Sci Lund, Dept Pathol & Oncol, Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Surg, Clin Sci Malmo, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[4] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Lund, Sweden
[5] Hosp Helsingborg, Dept Surg, Helsingborg, Sweden
[6] Unilabs Pathol Unit, Helsingborg, Sweden
[7] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Malmo, Sweden
[8] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Mol & Immunol Pathol, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; PRIMARY THERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; HIGHLIGHTS; IMPACT; WOMEN; SURVIVAL; TUMORS; HER2;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.10070
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Diagnosis by screening mammography is considered an independent positive prognostic factor, although the data are not fully in agreement. The aim of the study was to explore whether the mode of detection (screening-detected versus symptomatic) adds prognostic information to the St Gallen molecular subtypes of primary breast cancer, in terms of 10-year cumulative breast cancer mortality (BCM). Methods: A prospective cohort of patients with primary breast cancer, who had regularly been invited to screening mammography, were included. Tissue microarrays were constructed from primary tumours and lymph node metastases, and evaluated by two independent pathologists. Primary tumours and lymph node metastases were classified into St Gallen molecular subtypes. Cause of death was retrieved from the Central Statistics Office. Results: A total of 434 patients with primary breast cancer were included in the study. Some 370primary tumours and 111 lymph node metastases were classified into St Gallen molecular subtypes. The luminal A-like subtype was more common among the screening-detected primary tumours (P=0.035) and corresponding lymph node metastases (P=0.114) than among symptomatic cancers. Patients with screening-detected tumours had a lower BCM (P=0.017), and for those diagnosed with luminal A-like tumours the 10-year cumulative BCM was 3 per cent. For patients with luminal A-like lymph node metastases, there was no BCM. In a stepwise multivariable analysis, the prognostic information yielded by screening detection was hampered by stage and tumour biology. Conclusion: The prognosis was excellent for patients within the screening programme who were diagnosed with a luminal A-like primary tumour and/or lymph node metastases. Stage, molecular pathology and mode of detection help to define patients at low risk of death from breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 523
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Explaining the difference in prognosis between screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers [J].
Allgood, P. C. ;
Duffy, S. W. ;
Kearins, O. ;
O'Sullivan, E. ;
Tappenden, N. ;
Wallis, M. G. ;
Lawrence, G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 104 (11) :1680-1685
[2]  
[Anonymous], SWED CANC SOC ANN RE
[3]  
[Anonymous], BIOMED RES INT
[4]   Favourable prognostic factors of subsequent screen-detected breast cancers among women aged 50-69 [J].
Chiarelli, Anna M. ;
Edwards, Sarah A. ;
Sheppard, Amanda J. ;
Mirea, Lucia ;
Chong, Nelson ;
Paszat, Lawrence ;
Shumak, Rene S. ;
O'Malley, Frances P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 21 (06) :499-506
[5]   Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series [J].
Crispo, Anna ;
Barba, Maddalena ;
D'Aiuto, Giuseppe ;
De Laurentiis, Michelino ;
Grimaldi, Maria ;
Rinaldo, Massimo ;
Caolo, Giuseppina ;
D'Aiuto, Massimiliano ;
Capasso, Immacolata ;
Esposito, Emanuela ;
Amore, Alfonso ;
Di Bonito, Maurizio ;
Botti, Gerardo ;
Montella, Maurizio .
BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
[6]   Molecular characteristics of screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancers and their impact on survival [J].
Dawson, S. J. ;
Duffy, S. W. ;
Blows, F. M. ;
Driver, K. E. ;
Provenzano, E. ;
LeQuesne, J. ;
Greenberg, D. C. ;
Pharoah, P. ;
Caldas, C. ;
Wishart, G. C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (08) :1338-1344
[7]   Mammographic screening detects low-risk tumor biology breast cancers [J].
Drukker, C. A. ;
Schmidt, M. K. ;
Rutgers, E. J. T. ;
Cardoso, F. ;
Kerlikowske, K. ;
Esserman, L. J. ;
van Leeuwen, F. E. ;
Pijnappel, R. M. ;
Slaets, L. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
van't Veer, L. J. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 144 (01) :103-111
[8]   PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ELSTON, CW ;
ELLIS, IO .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) :403-410
[9]   Impact of mammographic screening on the detection of good and poor prognosis breast cancers [J].
Esserman, Laura J. ;
Shieh, Yiwey ;
Rutgers, Emiel J. T. ;
Knauer, Michael ;
Retel, Valesca P. ;
Mook, Stella ;
Glas, Annuska M. ;
Moore, Dan H. ;
Linn, Sabine ;
van Leeuwen, Flora E. ;
van 't Veer, Laura J. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 130 (03) :725-734
[10]   Biomarker expression and St Gallen molecular subtype classification in primary tumours, synchronous lymph node metastases and asynchronous relapses in primary breast cancer patients with 10 years' follow-up [J].
Falck, Anna-Karin ;
Bendahl, Par-Ola ;
Chebil, Gunilla ;
Olsson, Hans ;
Ferno, Marten ;
Ryden, Lisa .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 140 (01) :93-104