Quantitative evaluation of the accuracy and variance of individual pixels in a scientific CMOS (sCMOS) camera for computational imaging

被引:9
|
作者
Watanabe, Shigeo [1 ]
Takahashi, Teruo [1 ]
Bennett, Keith [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamamatsu Photon KK, Syst Div, 812 Joko Cho, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 4313196, Japan
关键词
sCMOS camera; photoresponse uniformity; variance map; photoresponse linearity; dark offset; SINGLE-MOLECULE LOCALIZATION;
D O I
10.1117/12.2251043
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
The "scientific" CMOS (sCMOS) camera architecture fundamentally differs from CCD and EMCCD cameras. In digital CCD and EMCCD cameras, conversion from charge to the digital output is generally through a single electronic chain, and the read noise and the conversion factor from photoelectrons to digital outputs are highly uniform for all pixels, although quantum efficiency may spatially vary. In CMOS cameras, the charge to voltage conversion is separate for each pixel and each column has independent amplifiers and analog-to-digital converters, in addition to possible pixel-to-pixel variation in quantum efficiency. The "raw" output from the CMOS image sensor includes pixel-to-pixel variability in the read noise, electronic gain, offset and dark current. Scientific camera manufacturers digitally compensate the raw signal from the CMOS image sensors to provide usable images. Statistical noise in images, unless properly modeled, can introduce errors in methods such as fluctuation correlation spectroscopy or computational imaging, for example, localization microscopy using maximum likelihood estimation. We measured the distributions and spatial maps of individual pixel offset, dark current, read noise, linearity, photoresponse non-uniformity and variance distributions of individual pixels for standard, off-the-shelf Hamamatsu ORCA-Flash4.0 V3 sCMOS cameras using highly uniform and controlled illumination conditions, from dark conditions to multiple low light levels between similar to 20 to similar to 1,000 photons/pixel per frame to higher light conditions. We further show that using pixel variance for flat field correction leads to errors in cameras with good factory calibration.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [31] Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging
    Arvanitis, C. D.
    Bohndiek, S. E.
    Royle, G.
    Blue, A.
    Liang, H. X.
    Clark, A.
    Prydderch, M.
    Turchetta, R.
    Speller, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (12) : 4612 - 4625
  • [32] Individual Evaluation of the Common Extensor Tendon and Lateral Collateral Ligament Improves the Severity Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lateral Epicondylitis
    Ikeda, Kazuhiro
    Ogawa, Takeshi
    Ikumi, Akira
    Yoshii, Yuichi
    Kohyama, Sho
    Ikeda, Reimi
    Yamazaki, Masashi
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (08)
  • [33] Evaluation of Veriton™ 360° CZT-camera performances for quantitative Dopamine Transporter (DaT) Imaging: a SPECT study based on quality and anthropomorphic phantoms
    Cassol, E.
    Gantet, P.
    Payoux, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (SUPPL 1) : S827 - S827
  • [34] 39 000-Subexposures/s Dual-ADC CMOS Image Sensor With Dual-Tap Coded-Exposure Pixels for Single-Shot HDR and 3-D Computational Imaging
    Gulve, Rahul
    Sarhangnejad, Navid
    Dutta, Gairik
    Sakr, Motasem
    Nguyen, Don
    Rangel, Roberto
    Chen, Wenzheng
    Xia, Zhengfan
    Wei, Mian
    Gusev, Nikita
    Lin, Esther Y. H.
    Sun, Xiaonong
    Hanxu, Leo
    Katic, Nikola
    Abdelhadi, Ameer M. S.
    Moshovos, Andreas
    Kutulakos, Kiriakos N. N.
    Genov, Roman
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS, 2023, 58 (11) : 3150 - 3163
  • [35] A multicentre and multi-national evaluation of the accuracy of quantitative Lu-177 SPECT/CT imaging performed within the MRTDosimetry project
    Tran-Gia, Johannes
    Denis-Bacelar, Ana M.
    Ferreira, Kelley M.
    Robinson, Andrew P.
    Calvert, Nicholas
    Fenwick, Andrew J.
    Finocchiaro, Domenico
    Fioroni, Federica
    Grassi, Elisa
    Heetun, Warda
    Jewitt, Stephanie J.
    Kotzassarlidou, Maria
    Ljungberg, Michael
    McGowan, Daniel R.
    Scott, Nathaniel
    Scuffham, James
    Gleisner, Katarina Sjogreen
    Tipping, Jill
    Wevrett, Jill
    Lassmann, Michael
    EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [36] A multicentre and multi-national evaluation of the accuracy of quantitative Lu-177 SPECT/CT imaging performed within the MRTDosimetry project
    Johannes Tran-Gia
    Ana M. Denis-Bacelar
    Kelley M. Ferreira
    Andrew P. Robinson
    Nicholas Calvert
    Andrew J. Fenwick
    Domenico Finocchiaro
    Federica Fioroni
    Elisa Grassi
    Warda Heetun
    Stephanie J. Jewitt
    Maria Kotzassarlidou
    Michael Ljungberg
    Daniel R. McGowan
    Nathaniel Scott
    James Scuffham
    Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner
    Jill Tipping
    Jill Wevrett
    Michael Lassmann
    EJNMMI Physics, 8
  • [37] Performance evaluation and quantitative accuracy of a multi-pinhole small animal SPECT/CT scanner for theranostic Lu-177 imaging
    Gupta, Arun
    Kim, Kyeong Yun
    Lee, Min Sun
    Hwang, Donghwi
    Lee, Dong Soo
    Lee, Jae Sung
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59
  • [38] Intra-individual comparison of different gadolinium-based contrast agents in the quantitative evaluation of C6 glioma with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Ying Li
    Gang Liu
    Xin Lou
    Zhiye Chen
    Lin Ma
    Science China(Life Sciences), 2017, (01) : 11 - 15
  • [39] Intra-individual comparison of different gadolinium-based contrast agents in the quantitative evaluation of C6 glioma with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Ying Li
    Gang Liu
    Xin Lou
    Zhiye Chen
    Lin Ma
    Science China Life Sciences, 2017, 60 : 11 - 15
  • [40] Intra-individual comparison of different gadolinium-based contrast agents in the quantitative evaluation of C6 glioma with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Ying Li
    Gang Liu
    Xin Lou
    Zhiye Chen
    Lin Ma
    Science China(Life Sciences), 2017, 60 (01) : 11 - 15