A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression

被引:131
作者
Eisendrath, Stuart J. [1 ]
Gillung, Erin [1 ]
Delucchi, Kevin L. [1 ]
Segal, Zindel V. [1 ]
Nelson, J. Craig [1 ]
McInnes, L. Alison [1 ]
Mathalon, Daniel H. [1 ]
Feldman, Mitchell D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, 401 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Cognitive therapy; Depression; Major depressive disorder; Mindfulness meditation; Mindfulness-based psychotherapy; Treatment-resistant depression; BEHAVIORAL-ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MAJOR DEPRESSION; TREATMENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; PREVENTION; RELAPSE; AUGMENTATION; RELAPSE/RECURRENCE; PHARMACOTHERAPY; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.1159/000442260
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Due to the clinical challenges of treatment-resistant depression (TRD), we evaluated the efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) relative to a structurally equivalent active comparison condition as adjuncts to treatment-as-usual (TAU) pharmacotherapy in TRD. Methods: This single-site, randomized controlled trial compared 8-week courses of MBCT and the Health Enhancement Program (HEP), comprising physical fitness, music therapy and nutritional education, as adjuncts to TAU pharmacotherapy for outpatient adults with TRD. The primary outcome was change in depression severity, measured by percent reduction in the total score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D 17), with secondary depression indicators of treatment response and remission. Results: We enrolled 173 adults; mean length of a current depressive episode was 6.8 years (SD = 8.9). At the end of 8 weeks of treatment, a multivariate analysis showed that relative to the HEP condition, the MBCT condition was associated with a significantly greater mean percent reduction in the HAM-D-17 (36.6 vs. 25.3%; p = 0.01) and a significantly higher rate of treatment responders (30.3 vs. 15.3%; p = 0.03). Although numerically superior for MBCT than for HEP, the rates of remission did not significantly differ between treatments (22.4 vs. 13.9%; p = 0.15). In these models, state anxiety, perceived stress and the presence of personality disorder had adverse effects on outcomes. Conclusions: MBCT significantly decreased depression severity and improved treatment response rates at 8 weeks but not remission rates. MBCT appears to be a viable adjunct in the management of TRD. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 110
页数:12
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DSM 5 DIAGN STAT MAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Manual for the childhood trauma questionnaire
[4]   Mechanisms of mindfulness: Emotion regulation following a focused breathing induction [J].
Arch, Joanna J. ;
Craske, Michelle G. .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2006, 44 (12) :1849-1858
[5]   Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness [J].
Baer, RA ;
Smith, GT ;
Hopkins, J ;
Krietemeyer, J ;
Toney, L .
ASSESSMENT, 2006, 13 (01) :27-45
[6]   Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as a treatment for chronic depression: A preliminary study [J].
Barnhofer, Thorsten ;
Crane, Catherine ;
Hargus, Emily ;
Amarasinghe, Myanthi ;
Winder, Rosie ;
Williams, J. Mark G. .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2009, 47 (05) :366-373
[7]   How Does MBCT for Depression Work? Studying Cognitive and Affective Mediation Pathways [J].
Batink, Tim ;
Peeters, Frenk ;
Geschwind, Nicole ;
van Os, Jim ;
Wichers, Marieke .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08)
[8]   Definition, assessment, and staging of treatment-resistant refractory major depression: A review of current concepts and methods [J].
Berlim, Marcelo T. ;
Turecki, Gustavo .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2007, 52 (01) :46-54
[9]  
Beutler L.E., 1990, SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT
[10]   Treatment-Specific Changes in Decentering Following Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Versus Antidepressant Medication or Placebo for Prevention of Depressive Relapse [J].
Bieling, Peter J. ;
Hawley, Lance L. ;
Bloch, Richard T. ;
Corcoran, Kathleen M. ;
Levitan, Robert D. ;
Young, L. Trevor ;
MacQueen, Glenda M. ;
Segal, Zindel V. .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) :365-372