Meeting Expectations of Patients With Cancer: Relationship Between Patient Satisfaction, Depression, and Coping

被引:21
作者
Goldzweig, Gil
Meirowitz, Amichai
Hubert, Ayala
Brenner, Baruch
Walach, Natalio
Perry, Shlomit
Hasson-Ohayon, Ilanit
Baider, Lea [1 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Univ Hosp, Sharett Inst Oncol, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
INFORMATION; CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; QUALITY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4987
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose This study assessed satisfaction of patients with cancer and the correlation between patient levels of satisfaction and the sociodemographic, medical, and psychological variables. Satisfaction measures were based on patient expectations for emotional and cognitive support by the oncologists. Patients and Methods A total of 1,027 patients with cancer were recruited from the outpatient departments and daycare treatment centers of four oncology institutes in Israel. Patient levels of expectations and satisfaction were assessed by using measures developed for this study. Patient psychological variables were assessed by using the Brief Symptoms Inventory, Impact of Events Scale, and Mental Adjustment to Cancer. chi(2) and Student t tests were used to assess differences between the highly satisfied group and the less satisfied group. Results Lower values of satisfaction were reported on the dimensions that included the patient in the treatment plan and that included explanations to the family. Higher percentages of women, single patients, younger patients, and patients in stages II to III were found in the less satisfied group. This group reported significantly higher levels of psychological distress, anxious preoccupation, and helplessness and lower levels of fighting spirit. Conclusion Given the importance of patient satisfaction to treatment compliance, oncologists should consider evaluating patient expectations for support, especially in issues concerning planning the treatment and involving the family in medical decisions. Oncologists should take into account the possible interdependence between psychological variables and medical-care satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:1560 / 1565
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Anderson Roger, 2007, J Med Pract Manage, V22, P255
[2]   FUNCTION OF PROFESSIONALS AFFECTIVE BEHAVIOR IN CLIENT SATISFACTION - REVISED APPROACH TO SOCIAL-INTERACTION THEORY [J].
BENSIRA, Z .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1976, 17 (01) :3-11
[3]   Cultural Challenges in Caring for Our Patients in Advanced Stages of Cancer [J].
Biasco, Guido ;
Surbone, Antonella .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (01) :157-158
[4]   Predicting and comparing patient satisfaction in four different modes of health care across a nation [J].
Bikker, Annemieke P. ;
Thompson, Andrew G. H. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (06) :1671-1683
[5]   Age and health status in a patient satisfaction survey [J].
Cohen, G .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1996, 42 (07) :1085-1093
[6]   THE BRIEF SYMPTOM INVENTORY - AN INTRODUCTORY REPORT [J].
DEROGATIS, LR ;
MELISARATOS, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1983, 13 (03) :595-605
[7]   Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: Elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions [J].
Elkin, Elena B. ;
Kim, Susie H. M. ;
Casper, Ephraim S. ;
Kissane, David W. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (33) :5275-5280
[8]   Receiving the diagnosis of lung cancer: Patient recall of information and satisfaction with physician communication [J].
Gabrijel, Sabine ;
Grize, Leticia ;
Helfenstein, Erich ;
Brutsche, Martin ;
Grossman, Paul ;
Tamm, Michael ;
Kiss, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (02) :297-302
[9]   Psychological distress among male patients and male spouses: what do oncologists need to know? [J].
Goldzweig, G. ;
Andritsch, E. ;
Hubert, A. ;
Brenner, B. ;
Walach, N. ;
Perry, S. ;
Baider, L. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 (04) :877-883
[10]   Patients' satisfaction and importance ratings of quality in an outpatient oncology center [J].
Gourdji, I ;
McVey, L ;
Loiselle, C .
JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2003, 18 (01) :43-55