Ethosuximide, Valproic Acid, and Lamotrigine in Childhood Absence Epilepsy.

被引:377
作者
Glauser, Tracy A. [1 ,2 ]
Cnaan, Avital [3 ]
Shinnar, Shlomo [4 ]
Hirtz, Deborah G. [5 ]
Dlugos, Dennis [6 ]
Masur, David [4 ]
Clark, Peggy O.
Capparelli, Edmund V. [7 ,8 ]
Adamson, Peter C. [6 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Div Neurol, Comprehens Epilepsy Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] NINDS, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[6] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Pediat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[8] Univ Calif San Diego, Skaggs Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SEIZURES; MONOTHERAPY; DIAGNOSIS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa0902014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Childhood absence epilepsy, the most common pediatric epilepsy syndrome, is usually treated with ethosuximide, valproic acid, or lamotrigine. The most efficacious and tolerable initial empirical treatment has not been defined. Methods: In a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we compared the efficacy, tolerability, and neuropsychological effects of ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in children with newly diagnosed childhood absence epilepsy. Drug doses were incrementally increased until the child was free of seizures, the maximal allowable or highest tolerable dose was reached, or a criterion indicating treatment failure was met. The primary outcome was freedom from treatment failure after 16 weeks of therapy; the secondary outcome was attentional dysfunction. Differential drug effects were determined by means of pairwise comparisons. Results: The 453 children who were randomly assigned to treatment with ethosuximide (156), lamotrigine (149), or valproic acid (148) were similar with respect to their demographic characteristics. After 16 weeks of therapy, the freedom-from-failure rates for ethosuximide and valproic acid were similar (53% and 58%, respectively; odds ratio with valproic acid vs. ethosuximide, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.98; P=0.35) and were higher than the rate for lamotrigine (29%; odds ratio with ethosuximide vs. lamotrigine, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.28; odds ratio with valproic acid vs. lamotrigine, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.06 to 5.42; P<0.001 for both comparisons). There were no significant differences among the three drugs with regard to discontinuation because of adverse events. Attentional dysfunction was more common with valproic acid than with ethosuximide (in 49% of the children vs. 33%; odds ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.41; P=0.03). Conclusions: Ethosuximide and valproic acid are more effective than lamotrigine in the treatment of childhood absence epilepsy. Ethosuximide is associated with fewer adverse attentional effects. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00088452.) N Engl J Med 2010;362:790-9.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 799
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Achenbach T., 2000, ACHENBACH SYSTEM EMP
[2]  
Achenbach T.M, 2001, Multicultural supplement to the manual for the ASEBA preschool forms profiles: Child Behavior Checklist for ages 1 1/2-5
[3]   PROPOSAL FOR REVISED CLASSIFICATION OF EPILEPSIES AND EPILEPTIC SYNDROMES [J].
不详 .
EPILEPSIA, 1989, 30 (04) :389-399
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, MULTI HEAL SYST
[5]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[6]  
BEERY KE, 1997, BEERYBUKTENICA DEV T
[7]   How well can epilepsy syndromes be identified at diagnosis? A reassessment 2 years after initial diagnosis [J].
Berg, AT ;
Shinnar, S ;
Levy, SR ;
Testa, FM ;
Smith-Rapaport, S ;
Beckerman, B .
EPILEPSIA, 2000, 41 (10) :1269-1275
[8]   The outcome of absence epilepsy: A meta-analysis [J].
Bouma, PAD ;
Westendorp, RGJ ;
vanDijk, JG ;
Peters, ACB ;
Brouwer, OF .
NEUROLOGY, 1996, 47 (03) :802-808
[9]  
Bourgeois Blaise F D, 2004, J Child Neurol, V19 Suppl 1, pS15, DOI 10.1177/088307380401900103
[10]  
Brown L., 1997, TEST NONVERBAL INTEL