State discrimination with postmeasurement information and incompatibility of quantum measurements

被引:36
作者
Carmeli, Claudio [1 ]
Heinosaari, Teiko [2 ]
Toigo, Alessandro [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, DIME, Via Magliotto 2, I-17100 Savona, Italy
[2] Univ Turku, Dept Phys & Astron, Turku Ctr Quantum Phys, QTF Ctr Excellence, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
[3] Politecn Milan, Dipartmento Matemat, Piazza LeonardoVinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[4] INFN, Sez Milano, Via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milan, Italy
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
OPTIMAL CLONING; PURE STATES; OBSERVABLES;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.98.012126
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
We discuss the following variant of the standard minimum error state discrimination problem: Alice picks the state she sends to Bob among one of several disjoint state ensembles, and she communicates him the chosen ensemble only at a later time. Two different scenarios then arise: either Bob is allowed to arrange his measurement setup after Alice has announced him the chosen ensemble, or he is forced to perform the measurement before Alice's announcement. In the latter case, he can only postprocess his measurement outcome when Alice's extra information becomes available. We compare the optimal guessing probabilities in the two scenarios, and we prove that they are the same if and only if there exist compatible (i.e., jointly measurable) optimal measurements for all of Alice's state ensembles. When this is the case, postprocessing any of the corresponding joint measurements is Bob's optimal strategy in the postmeasurement information scenario. Furthermore, we establish a connection between discrimination with postmeasurement information and the standard state discrimination. By means of this connection and exploiting the presence of symmetries, we are able to compute the various guessing probabilities in many concrete examples.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   An invitation to quantum incompatibility [J].
Heinosaari, Teiko ;
Miyadera, Takayuki ;
Ziman, Mario .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL, 2016, 49 (12)
[12]   Maximally incompatible quantum observables [J].
Heinosaari, Teiko ;
Schultz, Jussi ;
Toigo, Alessandro ;
Ziman, Mario .
PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2014, 378 (24-25) :1695-1699
[13]  
Helstrom C. W., 1976, QUANTUM DETECTION ES
[14]  
Holevo A. S., 1978, P STEKLOV I MATH, P3
[15]  
Holevo AS., 1973, Journal of multivariate analysis, V3, P337, DOI [10.1016/0047-259x(73)90028-6, 10.1016/0047-259X(73)90028-6]
[16]  
Jencova A., ARXIV170508008
[17]   Optimal cloning of pure states, testing single clones [J].
Keyl, M ;
Werner, RF .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 40 (07) :3283-3299
[18]  
Lahti P., 1997, Reports on Mathematical Physics, V39, P339, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4877(97)89752-2
[19]   Specker's parable of the overprotective seer: A road to contextuality, nonlocality and complementarity [J].
Liang, Yeong-Cherng ;
Spekkens, Robert W. ;
Wiseman, Howard M. .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2011, 506 (1-2) :1-39
[20]   All measurements in a probabilistic theory are compatible if and only if the state space is a simplex [J].
Plavala, Martin .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2016, 94 (04)