A meta-analytical review of intervention experiments to reduce food waste

被引:17
作者
Tian, Xi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xia, Ziqian [4 ,5 ]
Xie, Jinliang [2 ]
Zhang, Chao [5 ]
Liu, Yaobin [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Ming [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Res Ctr Cent China Econ & Social Dev, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, Jiangxi Ecol Civilizat Res Inst, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[4] Nanchang Univ, Sch Qianhu, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[5] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
food waste; meta-analysis; behavioural intervention; pro-environmental behaviour; PLATE WASTE; BEHAVIOR; METAANALYSIS; STRATEGIES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ac72b6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To reduce food waste, many behavioural intervention experiments have been conducted worldwide, but their effectiveness remains unclear. To assess their impacts, we present a meta-analysis based on 58 studies, selected after screening 1143 papers, which were conducted between 2011 and 2021 covering 26 533 participants. We confirm that behavioural interventions have a moderate effect (z = 0.22) on food waste reduction, with education programs having the most significant impact and informational feedback having the least. We also show that interventions in elementary and middle school settings marginally improve the overall effect size (P < 0.1), and controlled experiments exhibit a higher effect size compared to pre-post experiments in education interventions (P < 0.05). Finally, we present a roadmap to guide future research in the next decade to further improve our understanding on the effects of behavioural interventions to reduce food waste.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report 2019
[2]   Promoting Food Waste Reduction at Primary Schools. A Case Study [J].
Anton-Peset, Adriana ;
Fernandez-Zamudio, Maria-Angeles ;
Pina, Tatiana .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (02) :1-19
[3]   Smart Earth: A meta-review and implications for environmental governance [J].
Bakker, Karen ;
Ritts, Max .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2018, 52 :201-211
[4]   A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis [J].
Borenstein, Michael ;
Hedges, Larry V. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Rothstein, Hannah R. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (02) :97-111
[5]   The Use of Green Nudges as an Environmental Policy Instrument [J].
Carlsson, Fredrik ;
Gravert, Christina ;
Johansson-Stenman, Olof ;
Kurz, Verena .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2021, 15 (02) :216-237
[6]   Pre-post effect sizes should be avoided in meta-analyses [J].
Cuijpers, P. ;
Weitz, E. ;
Cristea, I. A. ;
Twisk, J. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2017, 26 (04) :364-368
[7]   Extended valence theory perspective on consumers' e-waste recycling intentions in Japan [J].
Dhir, Amandeep ;
Malodia, Suresh ;
Awan, Usama ;
Sakashita, Mototaka ;
Kaur, Puneet .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 312
[8]  
Edenhofer O., 2015, Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, V3
[9]   Carbon footprint of food waste management options in the waste hierarchy - a Swedish Case study [J].
Eriksson, Mattias ;
Strid, Ingrid ;
Hansson, Per-Anders .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 93 :115-125
[10]   Social Norms and Pro-environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence [J].
Farrow, Katherine ;
Grolleau, Gilles ;
Ibanez, Lisette .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 140 :1-13